SBIR/STTR Research Award

Fast and precise electrostatic beam position control for an atomic-resolution STEM

Award identifier 138fe4d2b30de93cf9458e1f543e6ddb6a87c9ee42d108fb2f959ce9011abf20Awarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$199,715

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2023

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
Nion Co
Proposal award date
2023-02-21
Contract end date
2023-11-20
UEI
WMLSX25UCRN9
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
C55-10b

Research abstract

C55-10b-270389Recent developments in electron microscopes, especially improved optics and new detectors have led to new types of experiments in the fields of physics, quantum information, and biology. With all the recent progress, one key system of the microscope, the scanning system, has fallen behind. The proposed development will introduce a fundamentally new type of scanning system that replaces slow electromagnetic scans with faster, more precise, electrostatic scanning. The capabilities of the scanning transmission electron microscope (STEM) have expanded tremendously in recent years, to the point that individual atom’s identity and lattice dynamics can now be probed by electron energy loss spectroscopy (EELS). These capabilities are enabled and accelerated by technical developments in aberration correction, electron detectors, monochromators, spectrometers, and open-source software. Throughout this renaissance, the scanning system itself – a key component of every STEM - has remained relatively constant. To overcome the current limitations, a fundamentally new approach is required—replacing slow electromagnetic scan coils with electrostatic scanning. Phase I work will consist of proof-of- principle experiments and calculations leading toward the design of a practical, marketable electrostatic scanning system for STEM for building in Phase II. In Phase I, a prototype electrostatic scan system will be designed, built, and tested. The results will inform design decisions for Phase II in each of three key areas: (1) deflector hardware— prototype electrostatic deflector plates will be mounted on the column to assess the temporal response (MHz-GHz), induced aberrations, and effect of instabilities. (2) fast control electronics—existing electromagnetic scan control electronics will be extensively modified to enable electrostatic scanning for testing low noise deflection voltages over a wide range of magnifications at high speed. (3) software—to match the hardware capabilities and with architecture and API providing advanced users access to arbitrary scans quickly and efficiently. The proposed development will enable new types of experiments for researchers around the world who invest in this technology and generate a marketable unique upgrade product for the only US-based electron microscope manufacturer, leading to more jobs in Washington state.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

7 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2002–2023). Reported award amounts total $3,576,529. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Energy

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.