SBIR/STTR Research Award

Development of a sensitive method to measure heparan sulfate 6-O-endosulfatase

Award identifier ecc3601380bc834c394c46c4c37000ab8bf75fb8abb7e03dfeb5e98e2934790dAwarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$350,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2023

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
GLYCAN THERAPEUTICS CORPORATION
Proposal award date
2023-02-01
Contract end date
2024-01-31
UEI
KYG3DZSMH4R7
Solicitation number
PA21-259
Topic code
300

Research abstract

The proposal is aimed to develop a sensitive method to measure the activity of heparan sulfate 6-O-endosulfatase (SULF). SULF is an enzyme that removes the 6-O-sulfo groups from heparan sulfate polysaccharides to modulate the functions of heparan sulfate. Evidence has demonstrated that the level of SULF contributes to the progression of cancers; however, the method that measures the activity from biological sources is lacking. In this phase I SBIR proposal, we propose to use a LC-MS/MS method to determine the activity from plasma and solid tissues. The crucial innovation is that we will use structurally homogeneous heparan sulfate oligosaccharides as substrates to address the issue for the selectivity of the measurement. In addition, we plan to use 13C-labeled oligosaccharide substrates and coupled with disaccharide analysis using a LC-MS/MS, which is expected to increase the sensitivity and add quantitation capability. Aim 1 is designed to find the optimal oligosaccharides for purified SULF enzyme, demonstrating the feasibility of using oligosaccharides to measure the activity of SULFS, including both SULF-1 and SULF-2. We plan to test different oligosaccharides in the size ranging from hexasaccharide (6-mer) to octasaccharide (8- mer). Aim 2 is improve the quantification accuracy using 13C-labeled HS oligosaccharide substrates and LC-MS/MS. Here, we plan to use 13C-labeled oligosaccharide substrate in the analysis. The use of 13C-labeled substrate will eliminate the interference from endogenous HS. Instead of directly measuring de-sulfated oligosaccharide, we plan to degrade the 13C-labeled oligosaccharides into disaccharides using heparin lyases followed by LC-MS/MS analysis. We expect that disaccharide analysis will significantly increase the sensitivity compared to the measurement of intact oligosaccharides, offering a sensitive and quantitative method to measure the activity of SULF from tissues and plasma. In the phase II analysis, we plan to expand the analysis to a wide range of cancer tissues. The success will lead to a necessary tool for glycoscience to investigate the roles of heparan sulfate in cancers.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

23 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2013–2024). Reported award amounts total $24,774,511. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.