SBIR/STTR Research Award

External Payload Deployment System for Cylindrical UUVs

Award identifier eb2208a06c725447f38d3d538c38c834d0d0609af4705a52607f055f1f9f6a64Awarding agency Department of Defense · Navy

Award amount

$1,998,926

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2023

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Navy
Recipient company
ARMADA MARINE ROBOTICS INC
Proposal award date
2023-01-30
Contract end date
2027-01-28
UEI
HVW9ABY1QJX6
Solicitation number
21.2
Topic code
N212-123

Research abstract

The Navy has identified a need for External Payload Deployment Systems (EPADS) for cylindrical Unmanned Underwater Vehicles (UUVs) between 5 and 21 inches in diameter. ARMADA Marine Robotics has assembled a team of experts to address this need with this Phase II SBIR. This effort will build upon our successful Phase I Base effort that determined an A-Size (4.875” diameter x 36”) payload body as a suitable form factor for delivering a 5kg module. Under Phase I work we validated hydrodynamic simulations with in-water testing to quantify the effects of multiple payloads and payload configurations on vehicle endurance and controllability. In-water tests were conducted with proprietary hydrodynamic A-Size dummy payloads carried on a REMUS 600 UUV. It was confirmed that two A-Size external payloads would not decrease the UUV mission time by more than 25% and the parasitic drag of the mounting hardware would be less than 10% over the unmodified vehicle drag.  EPADS is based on previous work at the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI) in deliverable transponders. The approach uses a payload that can be neutrally ballasted in a range of seawater densities, including freshwater, so that it has no effect on host UUV buoyancy when attached. Upon receiving an acoustic release command from the UUV, a motor opens a valve that floods a vacuum, making the payload negatively buoyant, and the payload detaches and descends to the seafloor target location. The UUV, which sees no net ballast change upon release of the payload and maintains neutral buoyancy throughout the deployment. WHOI has expressed interest in licensing and we will continue to partner with WHOI for development in Phase II. Work under the Phase II Base effort will include fabrication of the A-Size prototype designed in the Phase I Option, followed by bench, dockside, and tank validation testing. After a Critical Design Review, a revised design will be made and four units fabricated. Tank and open-water testing will be conducted to quantify deployment accuracy under, leveraging a REMUS 600 UUV as the host vehicle for the open-water tests. A Phase II Option is proposed that expands external payload deployment capabilities to other module sizes and classes of UUVs.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

6 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2020–2025). Reported award amounts total $2,972,287. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Science Foundation, Department of Commerce

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.