SBIR/STTR Research Award

Component Optimization for Improved Refrigerant Recovery

Award identifier 873a9b1161228843371b36aa94e57e7edc0c65bf090ac55c7f1d15181dc85f4aAwarding agency Environmental Protection Agency

Award amount

$99,945

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2023

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Environmental Protection Agency
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
Optimized Thermal Systems, Inc.
Proposal award date
2022-12-01
Contract end date
2023-05-31
UEI
LXZBYJ6JJRE5
Solicitation number
68HERC22R0180
Topic code
2E

Research abstract

Refrigerants are known to have harmful impacts on the environment. It is essential that those that are particularly harmful with a high global warming potential (GWP) are recovered correctly for proper recycling or disposal. Unfortunately, all too often, refrigerant is not properly recovered either due to system failure, technician error, or unincentivized industry practice. With implementation of the AIM act, proper refrigerant recovery of hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) will be necessary to enable the transition to lower GWP refrigerant solutions and minimize harmful effects on the environment. To ensure proper recovery occurs, improvements in the recovery process are needed. Any methods of making the recovery process easier, faster and cheaper will increase the likelihood of proper refrigerant recovery. Systematic experimental evaluation will be used to quantify impacts on increasing the speed of the refrigerant recovery process for individual recovery machines typically used for residential and light commercial systems. Based on gathered data, possible solutions for recovery machine and/or process improvement will be identified. These include, but are not limited to, optimized heat exchanger designs to maintain proper temperature and pressure control, improved pump and fan design, and additional process improvements that will ultimately lead to faster and easier refrigerant recovery. The developed product will replace existing technology on the market by delivering a solution that results in easier and faster refrigerant recovery. Total unit cost and weight will be kept the same as the existing baseline or with only marginal increase to maintain competitive advantage. Performance improvements incorporated are readily available and easily integrated, drawing from state-of-the-art technology established in other HVAC&R products. Phase I efforts will result in a prototype design for an improved recovery machine that will be constructed and tested in a Phase II effort. Work will be conducted by Optimized Thermal Systems, Inc. (OTS), an engineering consulting company with extensive experience in the field of energy conversion and a vast network in the HVAC&R industry. Early laboratory testing will be conducted in OTS’ Beltsville, Maryland facility followed by systematic analysis and design for an improved recovery machine product.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

3 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2014–2023). Reported award amounts total $365,317. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I

Agencies: Environmental Protection Agency, Department of Defense, Department of Energy

Agency intelligence

Environmental Protection Agency

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.