SBIR/STTR Research Award

Improved High-Temperature Cable and Connector Package for RF Applications

Award identifier 7d35c1a5fe5cd6bf9327dfd687472d422b00c938588b5bd37ba37f95b94e6aa8Awarding agency Department of Defense · Navy

Award amount

$138,667

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2023

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Navy
Recipient company
ADIABATICS, INCORPORATED
Proposal award date
2022-11-28
Contract end date
2023-05-29
UEI
GK4YEJYEW3U3
Solicitation number
22.2
Topic code
N222-122

Research abstract

During Phase I, Adiabatics, Inc. will use generator “best design” technical practices as well as new proprietary technology to develop a solution for high temperature cable and connector development for radio frequency (RF) applications in harsh environments.  First, Adiabatics, Inc. will develop a heat transfer model of its proposed RF cable.  The cable includes many materials that Adiabatics, Inc. has chosen based on many years of high temperature engine performance work as well as its extensive background in high temperature coatings.  These will include high performance ceramic fibers, carbon black material, titanium, polysilazane, copper oxide and aluminum oxide.  Many of these materials and their uses are addressed in this proposal.  Once the model is generated, it will be used to verify existing cable temperature measurements for given external heat inputs.  Upon verification, Adiabatics, Inc. will use the model to predict temperature resistance performance for its high temperature cable design.  A simple prototype cable model that will be composed of the materials selected by Adiabatics, Inc. will be constructed and then tested to generate first iteration cable wire temperatures.  The heat transfer model developed by Adiabatics, Inc. will be used to confirm measurement of the actual wire temperatures.   A similar process will also be used on an RF cable connector.  Adiabatics, Inc. will choose a reputable RF cable connector vendor to work with and design prototype RF cable connectors.  A heat transfer model of the connector will be developed by Adiabatics, Inc. once this connector design has been finalized.  It will then be used to predict existing cable connector temperature characteristics of an already existing RF cable connector.  The model will then be revised to match the new high temperature RF cable connector and calculated temperatures of the high temperature connector will be calculated.   Open communication between Adiabatics Inc. and the Navy is essential to the success of this design project.  Scheduled meetings will be held with the Navy and technical results will be shared and discussed.  At the conclusion of this project a solution for a high temperature RF cable and connectors will be developed.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

32 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1984–2023). Reported award amounts total $10,662,721. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.