SBIR/STTR Research Award

Thermal Protection System Modeling and Simulation Software for Hardware in the Loop

Award identifier f53b05daa5deb38b1e8300992be2534611aea169b93537dd59c3f2db3e8d1c9eAwarding agency Department of Defense · Navy

Award amount

$239,871

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2023

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Navy
Recipient company
CFD Research Corporation
Proposal award date
2022-11-28
Contract end date
2024-07-08
UEI
V3KCP1HNFM33
Solicitation number
22.2
Topic code
N222-123

Research abstract

Hypersonic technologies have rapidly evolved in recent years, with maneuverable hypersonic glide vehicles and cruise missiles posing a more serious threat that is more difficult to counter than conventional ballistic missiles. To remain competitive, existing systems need to be further matured and adapted towards greater maneuverability, accelerations, and speeds. A well-characterized thermal protection system (TPS) is required to ensure the vehicle can sustain prolonged flights in these hypersonic environments and to protect the underlying system hardware such as the structural components, sensor/seeker systems, navigation guidance and controls (NG&C) hardware, payload, and other electrical and hardware components for the extreme external flow environment. The Navy has identified the need to expand its ability to do real-time system level test and evaluation of hypersonic weapons. The Navy requires a fast-running, high-fidelity software model to interface with the system-level test architecture for modeling the TPS response to the advanced hypersonic aerodynamic environment for Hardware-in-the-loop (HWIL) system testing. Recognizing this critical need, CFD Research proposes to provide an enhanced TPS M&S framework, the Hypersonic Environment Analysis Toolkit (HEAT), to demonstrate the desired capability for the Navy . CFD Research will partner with Kratos Southern Research Engineering (KRSE) to develop and execute a material characterization test plan. The Phase I will see verification / validation of the HEAT analysis for relevant materials and adaptation of the existing application programming interface by a relevant software platform or language to the Navy system level test architecture. KRSE will provide a Phase II test plan. In the Phase I Option, KRSE will conduct initial material tests and provide data to CFD Research to validate the testing and modeling approaches. Further, CFD Research will also begin development of boundary layer heat transfer surrogate modeling for further augmentation of HEATÆs execution times. In Phase II, the team will execute the proof-of-concept methodology developed in the Phase I on Navy-provided materials, geometries, and trajectories.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

947 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1987–2026). Reported award amounts total $350,893,199. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Health and Human Services, National Science Foundation, Department of Commerce, Department of Energy

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.