SBIR/STTR Research Award

Reactive Materials for Enhanced Munitions

Award identifier b19abfaa3980316b4ff98b08e077944f8df1a1da66456efa35ed4c2452cae230Awarding agency Department of Defense · Army

Award amount

$172,957

Program and phase

STTR · Phase I

Award year

2022

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Army
Recipient company
HAMR INDUSTRIES LLC
Proposal award date
2022-09-30
Contract end date
2023-03-30
UEI
ZRNGHLLGKFD6
Solicitation number
22.B
Topic code
A22B-T004

Research abstract

Munitions systems are becoming increasingly complex to address the challenges of the modern battlefield.  This includes the addition of a suite of sensors, actuators, and guidance systems to enable long-range, precision fire.  Man-portable unmanned aerial systems (UAS) and missile systems provide the warfighter with on-demand air support, but do so under significant size weight and power - cost (SWaP-C) constraints.  In both scenarios, the available warhead mass and volume is limited.  Desires to improved warhead performance are therefore reliant on improved explosive energy.  Unfortunately, modern high-explosives have reached a point of only incremental improvements in blast energy.  Solutions are needed which can enhance blast energy with minimal increase to an asset’s SWaP-C. To maintain an asymmetric advantage in our military capabilities, better methods must be developed to improve the explosive yield of munitions through the use of reactive materials (RM) as a casing replacement or liner. RMs supply additional energy to blast and enhance blaster performance.  For low SWaP-C applications, there is a desire to replace liners and casings with RMs to provide a drop-in solution which enhanced blast performance and does not result in requalification of the explosive. In the proposed work, HAMR Industries LLC, in collaboration with the Applied Research Laboratory at Penn State University (ARL-PSU) will demonstrate the improved blast potential of reactive munition casings produced via a novel additive manufacturing process.  A Ni-Al intermetallic powder system will be used as the casing material in the Phase I feasibility study, and its blast potential will be evaluated with multiple HE material to understand if synergistic relationships occur.  HF-1 steel will serve as a baseline to benchmark the blast performance improvements and structural integrity. In addition, new material systems will be developed and tested using lab-scale ignition and propagation studies to demonstrate the potential for more powerful RMs which can act as structural, load bearing components.  Combining these new materials with the process-structure-property relationships and HE-RM relationships derived in Phase I will enable the team to begin optimization of blast performance in Phase II, and initiate platform specific prototype demonstrations.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

14 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2017–2025). Reported award amounts total $5,837,244. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, Department of Energy, National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.