SBIR/STTR Research Award

Tricorder Array Technologies Animal Welfare Sensor

Award identifier a0d3b76f69ddbb0d184c885ee992b749eaeb03f73265f0b7d54c5b49aaaaca21Awarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$2,346,998

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2022

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
TRICORDER ARRAY TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Proposal award date
2022-09-15
Contract end date
2024-08-31
UEI
H6J8BS8H1Z33
Solicitation number
PAR21-225
Topic code
100

Research abstract

PROJECT SUMMARY Tricorder Array Technologies, LLC (Tricorder), will develop, in partnership with the University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB), SIDECARe™ (Tricorder Array Technologies Animal Welfare Sensor). SIDECARe™ is set to improve research animal care at the cage level on a massive cost-effective scale by automating the collection of relevant data to enhance consistency and reproducibility of animal models. SIDECARe™ will revolutionize monitoring the health and well- being of mice by being the first to categorize mouse ultrasonic vocalizations (mUSV). In this Phase-II application, aim 1 completes the integration of the continuous mUSV monitoring solution into SIDECARe™ devices. Aim 2 expands SIDECARe™ Artificial Intelligence (AI) enabled classification capabilities to cover the top causes of research disruption. Aim 3 optimizes the SIDECARe™ system via beta deployments in the UAB vivarium workflow. Finally, aim 4 deploys beta systems at external test sites for pre-sales trials. Tricorder’s innovative use of ultrasonic sensors allows the sensor array to pick up mouse vocalizations and use them to interpret health and social events in the cage. SIDECARe™ utilizes a distributed approach to deployment of the AI algorithms required for effective segmentation and interpretation of mUSVs. The focus of the current AI algorithms for SIDECARe™ is to detect conditions such as mouse pups in a cage, flooded cages, fighting animals, and ulcerative dermatitis. The continuous acquisition of mUSV data across increasing numbers of cages, however, represents a wealth of unexplored data available for future development of novel algorithms and new understandings of mouse behavior and well-being. Of particular importance to the SIDECARe™ system is to integrate continuous machine-learning algorithms, which constantly evolve to better identify additional factors and trends that contribute to increased rates of morbidity and mortality. The recorded presence of specific environmental conditions (cage lighting levels, temperature variations, humidity, ambient noise levels) correlated with mouse behaviors are useful for studying research outcomes and/or reproducibility.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

2 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2019–2022). Reported award amounts total $2,560,966. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase II, Phase I

Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.