SBIR/STTR Research Award

Experimental Studies for Feasibility of Manufacturing of Synthetic Stibnite for Ammunition Primer Feedstock

Award identifier 1f45fe6e7be586993aec1e8e2fd1c955db54987bb4437caeea2fc5039903b028Awarding agency Department of Defense · Defense Logistics Agency

Award amount

$100,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2022

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Defense Logistics Agency
Recipient company
PERPETUA RESOURCES IDAHO INC
Proposal award date
2022-09-09
Contract end date
2023-03-08
UEI
ZEDJRM7L5LE5
Solicitation number
22.2
Topic code
DLA222-005

Research abstract

The synthesis of antimony trisulfide (Sb2S3, the mineral stibnite) materials with well-controlled size, crystallinity and chemical purity is important in manufacturing for numerous electronics, munitions, solar, and chip-doping applications. Crystal growth methods have evolved considerably over the past few decades, primarily as an outgrowth from the electronics, solar energy and chip manufacturing industries. It is likely that some, but not all of these methods may have the potential to be scaled up into a cost-efficient large-scale process to manufacture crystalline antimony trisulfide to meet specifications for military primer material preparation utilizing more efficient and effective methods. Specific attempts to manufacture “synthetic” crystalline stibnite from high purity refined antimony metal and high purity sulfur has reportedly been tried periodically by ammunition primer manufacturers with mixed success.  The proposed project consists of two components with work to be conducted by experienced materials science investigators at the South Dakota School of Mines and Technology in collaboration with the SBC.  The first consists of a thorough literature review to evaluate and screen possible methods already in use in other industrial sectors to produce antimony trisulfide crystals or other sulfides. Results of the literature review will inform the selection of a candidate group of methodologies for a second component of work that will include preliminary laboratory investigations for feasibility of the techniques for more cost-efficient primer feedstock material manufacture.  Follow-up efforts to accomplish this would likely include a series of laboratory tests to investigate the range of temperatures and pressures (both for heating and cooling) needed to optimize stibnite crystal grain growth with the optimum crystallinity, chemical composition and grain size for primer manufacturing. Once laboratory testing helps determine the range, further larger scale testing could be undertaken in a Phase II project to develop a full-scale pilot plant to test the process and output. The anticipated schedule for this first phase is estimated to be less than or equal to 6-months depending on outcome of preliminary studies.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

2 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2022). Reported award amounts total $200,000. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I

Agencies: Department of Defense

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.