SBIR/STTR Research Award

Collaborative Autonomy and Resilience of Distributed Satellites (CARDS)

Award identifier 66d6a12517b3e86cc4c11c241e0c2cbebe24c399a2b977199339db87320d1fc8Awarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$149,940

Program and phase

STTR · Phase I

Award year

2022

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
XANALYTIX SYSTEMS LLC
Proposal award date
2022-09-02
Contract end date
2023-06-05
UEI
RRYCSUFDB511
Solicitation number
22.A
Topic code
AF22A-T003

Research abstract

The main objective of the solicitation is to assess the viability of a system to perform multi-perspective information fusion in an autonomous and distributed satellite architecture.  To address this objective, CARDS (Collaborative Autonomy and Resiliency for Distributed Satellites) will decompose the problem in answering three critical questions 1) What is the potential Information Gain (IG) of an AOI when fusing heterogeneous sensors from different agents (satellites)?  Given space and time, what is the value of assigning resources to that area at particular periods.  Answer:  Maximizing the effective utilization of a set of satellites in an ISR mission requires knowing when and where the information collected will provide the highest value for mission success.  Our approach allows for satellites with different levels of computational power.  The proposed approach satisfies this requirement in that it can be used both with intelligence-on-the-edge and legacy systems with limited computational capabilities and in a delayed/disconnected, intermittently-connected, low-bandwidth environment. 2) What is the suitability of a particular satellite or group of satellites (force composition) to address a specific potential IG over space and time?  Answer: Composing optimal forces for military tasking is a non-trivial problem when accounting for variables such as situational awareness, unit weapon/sensor capabilities, tasking priorities, and adversary behavior.  To facilitate decision-making in this sphere, we need to find the suitability of a particular asset to perform a task.  In space, the problem becomes more difficult since the orbit of satellites is predetermined and very costly (we will assume virtually impossible) to change.  This objective will investigate a scalable tree structure to determine the fitness of space objects to perform tasks over space and time 3) What is the scheduling assignment of tasks for satellites to maximize the potential IG over multiple missions in multiple AOIs based on required time windows and priorities?  Answer: CARDS will develop a multi-perspective approach based on a decentralized or hierarchical framework in which each satellite will have a “perspective” of what tasks other satellites might be performing based on the last synchronization and plausible futures.  To deal with the heterogeneous computational power, multiple algorithm types will work together to coordinate and collaborate when communications are possible.  The approach allows a commander to have multiple criteria to achieve objectives in both centralized and decentralized environments.  When the decision-maker is disconnected from coordination with other owners, they will utilize current situational awareness to maintain insight into what the assets that are not under their control have been assigned to do.  When coordination is reestablished, they will re-align their perspective of the mission to match the ground truth.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

28 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2016–2026). Reported award amounts total $16,148,561. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.