SBIR/STTR Research Award

Resistive Coatings for High-performance, Low-background MCPs Operating Across Broad Temperature Ranges and at Cryogenic Temperatures

Award identifier f6638c2089623c6517b654ddd51470a057d5088c6c43d885d415e403681d8e02Awarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$1,149,565

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2022

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
INCOM, INC.
Proposal award date
2022-08-22
Contract end date
2024-08-21
UEI
CLS5D7LVF9A3
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
C46-01d

Research abstract

The Phase IIB SBIR titled “Resistive Coatings for High-performance, Low- background MCPs Operating Across Broad Temperature Ranges and at Cryogenic Temperatures” addresses the temperature stability of MCPs that serve as electron multipliers in detectors. MCPs have a negative TCR, meaning the resistance decreases at increasing temperatures which limits the operational range. At high temperatures, the reduced resistance can lead to higher current draw and thermal runaway. At low temperatures, the high resistance leads to long channel dead times, saturation effects and decreased gain. In contrast to conventional MCPs, Incom’s ALD-GCA-MCP technology allows to address the thermo-electric characteristics. ALD is used to grow a resistive and emissive film on a GCA, defining the resistance and secondary electron yield of the MCP, respectively. This functionalization process allows the substitution of lead glass with durable glasses that enabled the fabrication of LAPPDs. This Phase IIB Funding Opportunity continues R&D started under Phase I and II to develop ALD-GCA-MCP with a low TCR resistive layer. The baseline material was optimized to TCR values of conventional MCPs and the optimization is stepwise introduced to the production. However, two alternative resistive coatings were identified as low-TCR materials. The optimized molybdenum-based layer can achieve TCR values down to -0.01 K-1 which means a considerable improvement of the MCP temperature stability. In the proposed Phase IIB a comparative TCR and manufacturability study of the two materials will be conducted in the 1st year to prepare for the commercialization of the selected material in the 2nd year. Additional low-TCR candidates are studied at the beginning of the Phase IIB to possibly achieve even better TCR characteristics. The temperature stable MCP resistance will facilitate the operation in in-field application of the MCPs, which includes the detection of special nuclear materials. Currently, the operational voltage has to be constantly adjusted to the changing conditions. Additional to non- proliferation the advances will have an impact in space flight missions and experimental physics. The improved applicability and performance of LAPPDs will also impact medical imaging products including detectors for positron emission tomography (PET scanning).

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

43 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1992–2025). Reported award amounts total $22,858,211. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Energy, National Science Foundation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Health and Human Services

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.