SBIR/STTR Research Award

Transformational Cryogenic Process for Carbon Dioxide Capture

Award identifier a605e23e2e2ff929eda5df0885c01cebcad311e66871ba2cce6734a0126bb2f4Awarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$1,600,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2022

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
INNOSEPRA LLC
Proposal award date
2022-08-22
Contract end date
2024-08-21
UEI
E7K5M2ZKHJG3
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
C52-25a

Research abstract

CO2 capture technologies that require lower capital and parasitic power are needed to make CO2 capture viable for sequestration and EOR applications. The current state-of-the-art CO2 capture technology, aqueous amine absorption, has a number of drawbacks, including significant capital and operating costs. The proposed CO2 capture process can reduce both the parasitic power and capital requirements thereby significantly reducing the overall cost for CO2 capture.The overall goal of this program is to demonstrate the technical and economic viability of CO2 capture under cryogenic conditions. This will be combined with a cost-effective flue gas pre- treatment process to remove moisture and acid gas impurities prior to CO2 capture. The process is expected to have lower parasitic power as well as lower capital cost compared to solvent-based capture processes resulting in >40% lower capture cost. Another goal of the program is to develop commercial relationships to enable rapid technology commercialization after the conclusion of the Phase II project.During Phase I InnoSepra identified materials that have very good CO2 capacities and CO2-N2 separation factors at cryogenic conditions. This coupled with a cost-effective pre-treatment process for the removal of moisture and other impurities developed in another project can lead to a cost-effective process for CO2 capture. During the project, InnoSepra will obtain data for cryogenic CO2 capture at the laboratory and semi-bench scale, determine the optimum operating conditions for cryogenic capture, and optimize the process to enable reduction in the parasitic power. Through process simulation and a techno-economic analysis InnoSepra will also demonstrate that the cryogenic CO2 capture can lead to both a lower capital and a lower parasitic power leading to a lower cost process for CO2 capture compared to other CO2 capture processes.If this technology is successful it can have a major impact on the future of fossil fuel-based power generation. We can continue to produce electrical power in a cost-effective way using abundant supplies of fossil fuels with significantly lower emissions of greenhouse gases, and without having a significant adverse effect on America's economic competitiveness. If the captured CO2 is used for enhanced oil recovery it will further reduce our dependenceon imported oil.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

10 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2010–2022). Reported award amounts total $6,296,000. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Energy, National Science Foundation

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.