SBIR/STTR Research Award

Innovative Engines for Small Unmanned Aerial Systems (SUAS)

Award identifier 71559ffb93372ce19c7148738dfb6b4be0bd0093c401ca9927426eae65e11b2aAwarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$149,964

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2022

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
GSE INC
Proposal award date
2022-08-17
Contract end date
2023-08-17
UEI
NNSNBAHXD5Z3
Solicitation number
21.2
Topic code
AF212-0010

Research abstract

With the specific output of any engine being directly proportionate to the weight of air consumed, the current Otto, Diesel, and Brayton Cycles have common UAS propulsion constraints in terms of power density, specific weight, and fuel consumption while operating on logistically available kerosene-based fuels. The combustion system efficiency is the most dominate parameter that defines the overall UAS propulsion system efficiency, while military fuel characteristics widely used (JP-8/F-24) are regulated by flash point alone. Fuel variations in viscosity, lubricity and cetane dictate the need for a true multi-fuel combustion system capable of extracting the utmost thermal yield from the fuel. The dominate use of the gas turbine in military applications is beneficial in terms of being lightweight and fuel agnostic but suffers from low pressure ratio and overall poor brake thermal efficiency. (BTE: 15~20%)  The popular use of spark ignited (SI) engines are limited by low fuel volatility/octane of turbine fuels and suffer from difficult cold start, chronic spark plug fouling, and ultimate detonation setting an early and harsh limit on the operating BMEP and/or bore size.(BTE: 10~15%) Conversely, the modern compression ignited (CI) Diesel engine is equally sensitive to kerosene fuel properties meaning variations in fuel viscosity and lubricity disrupt injection timing, injection pump life and adverse ignition delay proportionate to altitude. High altitude descent can lead to ultimate combustion flame out which now dictates additional fuel burn during high altitude descent. Scaling the (CI) engine down suffers from internal leakage and heat loss that requires exceedingly high compression ratios to operate on lower cetane turbine fuels with poor efficiency(18~20% BTE) and specific weight (3.3 lbs/hp). By contrast, this proposal outlines an innovative breakthrough in high-speed multi-fuel injection and heterogenous charge combustion that is insensitive to engine scale and/or compression ratio ideally suited for combine cycle engine design. Design attributes include passive pneumatic fuel injection combined with pilot ignition and true multi-fuel combustion chamber geometry extracting the utmost thermal yield from logistically available fuels (JP-5 / JP-8 / DF-2 / F-24).

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

16 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1997–2022). Reported award amounts total $5,109,802. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.