SBIR/STTR Research Award

Automated Subscale Ballistic Test Platform

Award identifier dc86586faa320fda404de79de758f537480b048cfe126877028174800df58b64Awarding agency Department of Defense · Army

Award amount

$172,996

Program and phase

STTR · Phase I

Award year

2022

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Army
Recipient company
CORVID TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
Proposal award date
2022-08-04
Contract end date
2023-02-03
UEI
DD7KTEMDG6A5
Solicitation number
21.C
Topic code
A21C-T006

Research abstract

New armor systems have the potential to maintain or increase protection while decreasing SWaP and cost.  Prior to integration into fielded systems, armor materials and configuration must be subjected to the anticipated attack conditions in a controlled test environment.  Ballistic performance of novel or enhanced materials is typically verified using traditional ballistics testing such as the V50 test for armor as described in MIL-STD-662.  Full scale testing demands a level of rigor that is ultimately at odds with modern demands for rapid materials development using a design-build-test cycle.  Improvements in throughput to the ‘test’ phase offer the largest overall increase in development cycle frequency. Sub-scale ballistics testing coupled with data driven models are a potential method for providing an initial screening step to determine if new candidate materials should continue to full scale testing.  Sub-scale testing provides faster feedback to the material design phase by eliminating unnecessary full-scale testing.  Large volumes of data generated by sub-scale testing can be used to create material models that not only screen poor performers, but also inform methods for increasing performance. Corvid Technologies (in partnership with North Carolina State University) proposes a gas gun-based indenter apparatus to produce large volumes of high strain rate impacts with automated instrumentation to rapidly evaluate the data.  The impact apparatus will be designed for high throughput so several operations related to the impact platform and data reduction will be automated.  An instrumentation setup at the impact site will capture relevant material response using high speed video, photon doppler velocimetry and load cells.  In-situ measurement of impact velocity, target rear surface velocity, impact force, and fragment imagery will be enabled by the target instrumentation.  A software toolkit will route the data collected during the experiment and automate the extraction of key information.  Developed methods will prioritize automation of data processing to obtain relevant material parameters that can be extrapolated to infer ballistic performance.  The goal of this product will be a piece of equipment used to supplement existing full scale ballistics testing techniques.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

226 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2005–2025). Reported award amounts total $135,094,490. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Energy

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.