SBIR/STTR Research Award

High-throughput size-selection system for long-read sequencing library preparation

Award identifier 9752cdbdd4d37d34291822f02db5dca66e741f3112c6936583edfb8b7743b0caAwarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$320,862

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2022

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
SAGE SCIENCE, INC.
Proposal award date
2022-08-03
Contract end date
2023-01-31
UEI
EA5AFFNALLJ7
Solicitation number
PA21-259
Topic code
172

Research abstract

Project Summary/Abstract Most long-read DNA sequencing methods depend on library size selection techniques to control and/or improve read lengths. In Oxford Nanopore and PacBio sequencing protocols, sample loading is dependent on diffusion of library molecules to the reader surface (waveguide surface for PacBio, or membrane for Oxford). Since small molecules have a higher rate of diffusion than larger molecules, size selection to eliminate small library fragments can greatly improve library read lengths. Popular methods for elimination of small library elements (generally lt6-10kb) in long read sequencing are preparative agarose gel electrophoresis (BluePippin, SageELF, PippinHT from Sage Science, Inc.), and PEG precipitation (Short Read Eliminator Kit, Circulomics, as well as home brew PEG methods). Of these methods, preparative gel electrophoresis is superior in rejecting small DNA molecules, but requires specialized instruments, consumable gel cassettes with bulky gel columns (6-10cm long) and low per- cassette sample throughputs, and long run times. In many long-read sequencing workflows, size selection is the most time-intensive step of the workflow. As long-read sequencing methods are rapidly becoming essential clinical research tools -- and increasingly attracting attention of medical testing labs -- it is important to develop size selection equipment and methods that have improved size range, improved resolution at large fragment sizes (10kb-200kb), faster run times, and higher sample throughput per run cycle. The goal of the present application is develop new preparative gel electrophoresis systems that utilize the nonlinear response of large DNAs: 1) while reorienting in response to certain pulsed field conditions, or 2) when subjected to forward and reverse voltage pulses of different strength. In both cases, we envision size selection processes in which targeted size fractions move very little and are recovered within (or near) the sample loading position. If successful, gel sizes and run times can be decreased dramatically, thereby relieving a bottleneck in long-read workflows that benefit from stringent size selection. Our ultimate goal is a family of size selection products that utilize SBS-format, automation-friendly gel cassettes with 48 or 96 well sample capacity.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

6 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2012–2024). Reported award amounts total $5,272,491. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.