SBIR/STTR Research Award

Infection Fighting Polymer Strengthened Biologic Grafts for Abdominal Wall Repair

Award identifier 1ba19204fe51b7f593b9f4be77009ccc806f9051b8a89cdbb40e36dca776980dAwarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$258,684

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2022

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
BioAesthetics Corporation
Proposal award date
2022-08-01
Contract end date
2023-07-31
UEI
CB6YT355CQK5
Solicitation number
PA21-259
Topic code
300

Research abstract

SUMMARY BioAesthetics is developing a novel acellular graft for improved abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR). A hernia is a condition in which an internal organ pushes through an opening in the muscle or tissue that holds it in place. More than one million hernia repair surgeries occur annually in the US, corresponding to healthcare costs of $48 billion annually. Hernia repair is the most common operation performed by general surgeons. Inguinal hernias – in which the lower abdominal wall is breached – are the most common type of hernias requiring repair. AWR is typically performed for treating recurring or severe inguinal hernias. Typical challenges observed with AWR include hernia recurrence, infections and trauma, and repair material failures. Recently, state-of-the- art dermal substitutes have been utilized that consist of acellular biologic grafts (ABGs). ABGs are widely used for wound repair, including AWR, but suffer from complication rates up to 40% due to infection, necrosis, and mechanical failure. There is a significant unmet need to identify novel, innovative approaches to safely treat patients undergoing AWR. BioAesthetics is developing a transformative antibiotic-loaded, polymer-strengthened ABG that delivers drugs to the surgical site during healing and provides an optimal regenerative scaffold. Our approach and application differ from competitive products on the market and should provide superior performance for improved patient outcomes. Our preliminary data demonstrate increased ABG mechanical strength as well as release of a model molecule from the ABG over 2 weeks. In this Phase I proposal, porcine ABGs will be impregnated with poly(lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) polymer loaded with the antibiotics rifampin and minocycline. We intend to (a) demonstrate release of the antibiotics in vitro, (b) evaluate mechanical properties of our product, and (c) assess in vivo efficacy of the product in a rodent model of AWR. If successful, we will thus generate proof-of-concept data demonstrating that our antibiotic- and polymer-impregnated ABGs are capable of reducing infection and promoting wound healing.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

5 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2021–2023). Reported award amounts total $3,078,638. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services, National Science Foundation

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.