SBIR/STTR Research Award

Modeling Platform Level Electromagnetic Compatibility Performance Based on Component Level Testing

Award identifier 762932148f67df0ca7865a696cbf6a65d3ddae5aaf13c607e6ad8f518bf329f9Awarding agency Department of Defense · Navy

Award amount

$239,961

Program and phase

STTR · Phase I

Award year

2022

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Navy
Recipient company
Electro Magnetic Applications, Inc.
Proposal award date
2022-07-18
Contract end date
2023-09-11
UEI
F3H8XS2L3D27
Solicitation number
22.A
Topic code
N22A-T006

Research abstract

Nearly every electronic module that is integrated into a Navy aircraft must pass MIL-STD-461 radiated emissions requirements (RE102), or Navy engineers must assess whether an exceedance of the radiated emissions limit is acceptable. To make a determination about a given exceedance, engineers must consider the specific emissions and how they could impact other electronic modules through coupling to cable harnesses, antennas, or directly to the other electronic modules. The process for assessing the impact is manual and often involves multiple engineers reviewing the details of the systems on the platform and potential interactions to reach a determination based on expectations and prior experience. In other words, the process is inexact and may result in interference to another system even after an engineering review deems the exceedance to be acceptable. On programs with little to no tolerance for risk, it may conversely result in lengthy and costly redesign work being performed even when the unit would have been successful integrated as-is onto a platform.  Numerical techniques have been developed for other electromagnetic applications for back projecting measured field data onto surfaces of a volume enclosing the device. The electric and magnetic fields on these near-field surfaces then represent the performance of the device. For example, this approach has been used very successfully for antennas. After the emissions data has been back projected onto the near-field surfaces, it can then be used in computational electromagnetic (CEM) simulation tools to compute coupling into cable harnesses, emissions from enclosures, and coupling to antennas on the aircraft.  EMA3D Cable is a mature simulation tool for addressing EMI/EMC problems and has been used in this capacity for decades to help military and commercial customers solve challenging problems. Through this effort, Electro Magnetic Applications, Inc. and the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign will collect measured radiated emissions data for several electronic devices and demonstrate numerical techniques to back project measured emissions data to near-field surfaces. Those can then be used in EMA3D Cable simulations to assess the impact of radiation emission exceedances on other electronic devices in an integrated platform.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

28 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2018–2025). Reported award amounts total $15,144,860. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, National Science Foundation

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.