SBIR/STTR Research Award

Solid State High Energy Desity Batteries

Award identifier 10cb985d36481a0863a7fdc09a4c17709a3adb3319d6e0364a2125d0345c08b3Awarding agency Department of Defense · Special Operations Command

Award amount

$149,954

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2022

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Special Operations Command
Recipient company
CFD Research Corporation
Proposal award date
2022-07-15
Contract end date
2023-01-30
UEI
V3KCP1HNFM33
Solicitation number
22.2
Topic code
SOCOM222-001

Research abstract

The modern warfare environment has demonstrated an ever-increasing need for electrical power and energy carrying capacity. Soldiers are now expected to carry in excess of 20lbs of batteries for a 72-hour mission. This weight only increases when operating specialized equipment such as communication, targeting, or mobility equipment. As a consequence, lithium-ion (Li-ion) battery packs have become the predominate form of man-portable energy storage. Unfortunately, this has introduced additional hazards to the forward area. State of the art lithium-ion battery cells are inherently hazardous items. They contain large amounts of energy in the form of chemical potential and are filled with a flammable electrolyte. If they are damaged through accident or enemy action, they have the potential to become sources of inextinguishable flames which also produce toxic acid smoke. The danger posed from battery pack failure is only enhanced in the maritime environment. For this Phase I SBIR program, CFD research proposes to greatly reduce the risk associated with high energy density battery packs through the implementation of Li-ion cells containing non-flammable electrolyte. Recent advancements in electrolyte technology have allowed the production of 18650 format Li-ion cells which are highly resistant to fire ignition. These non-flammable cells demonstrate similar performance to cells filled with traditional flammable carbonate-based electrolytes. CFD research will evaluate the performance characteristics of these non-flammable cells and utilize the data to retrofit existing battery packs. The primary target of this effort will be the improvement of electrically driven dive propulsion vehicle (DPV) safety and performance in forward areas. An existing 18650 based DPV battery pack will be performance tested, disassembled, and retrofit with non-flammable cells. The resulting non-flammable protype battery will be characterized utilizing the same procedure as the original flammable pack to provide a direct performance comparison between the two cell chemistries.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

947 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1987–2026). Reported award amounts total $350,893,199. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Health and Human Services, National Science Foundation, Department of Commerce, Department of Energy

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.