SBIR/STTR Research Award

Next Generation of High Energy Density Batteries at Low Cost

Award identifier 4e51415953071c6326dd24166b0eeecc9fe4915557967618e948d93fb56bb936Awarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$200,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2022

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
NANOHYDROCHEM LLC
Proposal award date
2022-06-27
Contract end date
2023-03-26
UEI
V3SKFQMSQXD3
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
C54-14a

Research abstract

Lithium-ion batteries are an attractive energy storage technology because of their high energy density and excellent rate capability. Silicon shows incredible potential to replace graphite as an anode material due to its high lithium-storage capacity. However, silicon volume expansion (up to 400%) leads to pulverization and consumption of both lithium and electrolyte during cycling. Thus, lack of stability and capacity fade has limited commercial adoption of silicon-dominant anodes. NanoHydroChem’s solution is a cost-effective silicon-dominant anode material with more than 80% silicon content and stable capacity. This goal is achieved by producing micron-sized clusters containing encapsulated silicon nanoparticles in an oversized graphene-like carbon shell and carbon matrix. We use highly scalable, well-established, and cost-effective processes to produce the anode material providing a clear path to scale-up and cost reduction. Our starting materials are bulk-size metallurgical-grade silicon and/or PV-grade silicon waste from the solar and semiconductor industries. We do not use pyrophoric silane gas and any custom-made reactors in the production process. The active material is 100% drop-in without a need for special handling. Nano-sized silicon particles can accommodate significant stress without cracking while providing short electronic and ionic transport distances that improve rate capability. The porous structure is engineered to contain the silicon volume expansion while providing maximum contact with the carbon shell. The carbon shell protects silicon from exposure to the electrolyte while enhancing electronic conductivity. The thin carbon shell allows for excellent lithiation/delithiation kinetics, which enables extreme fast charging. The carbon matrix inside the pores enhances the conductivity and creates a robust structure that mitigates any stress and compression force (especially during calendaring) on the structure. Over the past year, we successfully demonstrated the scale-up process in 100 grams per batch to produce the silicon-based anode active material with silicon content up to 80% using well-known commercially scalable processes. Our preliminary battery performance data show great promise, although room for improvement remains. Our main objective in this phase I project is to identify the most optimized anode material composition based on the full cell data. Specifically, we will produce nine variations (70, 80, and 90% Si content; each with 150, 250, and 350% porosity size) of the anode material and test their electrochemical performance in coin cells and single-layer pouch cells. Based on the performance data, we will identify three best compositions to prototype and test pouch cells with a minimum capacity of 200 mAh. Pouch cells with the final best composition will be delivered to DoE. The budget that we need for this Phase I project includes $200,000 for personnel, materials, supplies, and equipment beyond what is currently available. Subsequent phases of the SBIR program will further scale the process and battery testing toward electric vehicle applications, exceeding 2 Ah capacity in Phase II. Commercial feasibility and impact of this project are substantial. The demand for high energy density batteries is massive and growing. The lithium-ion battery market is projected to exceed $77B in 2024. As it grows, the market is looking for new materials to increase battery performance. Use of silicon as an anode material in Li-ion batteries is not new. However, combining performance and large-scale production feasibility has been a persistent challenge. Companies and research institutes have studied silicon-based lithium-ion batteries for over a decade, but none have reached large market applications such as cell phones and electric vehicles, presumably because of their failure to achieve cost-effective production at the scales required for such markets. Those that have been commercialized are being used in satellites and other niche applications, and have significantly lower performance than we have achieved in our laboratory-scale experiments. Thus, we believe that our innovative material and production process has great potential to scale up high performance and cost-effective silicon-carbon anodes by using well-known chemical processing technologies.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

2 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2022–2023). Reported award amounts total $1,349,999. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase II, Phase I

Agencies: Department of Energy

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.