SBIR/STTR Research Award

Integrated offset monitor for a sub-THz structure wakefield accelerator

Award identifier f7234012fb4cea4f1feae894701a289ad1fe8deadbd17fd05d5017687fe58ddbAwarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$199,596

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2022

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
RADIABEAM SYSTEMS, LLC
Proposal award date
2022-06-27
Contract end date
2023-03-26
UEI
GRKLZTXQZXE6
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
C54-29b

Research abstract

Structure-based wakefield accelerators (SWFA) are the most promising solution for the development of TeV-class linear electron-positron colliders and X-ray Free Electron Lasers (XFELs). Several groups, including Argonne National Laboratory, are developing novel highgradient mm-wave accelerating structures for SFWA. These structures have been already tested with the electron beam, but further development is limited by the lack of diagnostic tools such as an integrated offset monitor (IOM). This tool is needed ensure that the beam is centered inside the structure. Failure to provide this condition will lead to beam instabilities and bream breakup. Technical Approach We propose to develop and build an IOM detector system that employs a fast Schottky envelope detector and measures the signal amplitude and modulation. This design will be based on a mmwave heterodyne detector for RF breakdown diagnostics in accelerating structures that was recently developed by RadiaBeam. The two main challenges that would be solved during this project are the ability to detect 1.3 ns pulses with enough resolution, which is about an order magnitude shorter that was achieved during the previous experiments, and to filter-out a very strong high-frequency background signal caused by higher order modes (HOM) of the waveguide. Phase I Plans The proposed IOM design would be built up in two steps, with one building on the other. The Phase I design would employ a fast Schottky envelope detector and would measure the signal amplitude and modulation. We will adjust the circuitry around the Schottky diode to reduce its RC-time constant. We will also employ a bandpass filter to reject the background signal above 340 GHz and pass the signal at 190 GHz, using the quasi-optical approach (grating). In Phase II we will develop and build a heterodyne frequency downconverter, which would provide precise frequency information about the signal. Commercial Applications and Other Benefits The proposed monitor will allow the advancement of ultra-compact terahertz wakefield accelerators, enabling miniaturization of many future DOE accelerator facilities. In addition to the applications in SWFA, the detector can also be used for real-time THz source characterization, high-gradient mm-wave accelerators and FEL projects.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

61 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2013–2025). Reported award amounts total $34,857,770. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Energy

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.