SBIR/STTR Research Award

Low Temperature CO2 Capture from an NGCC Flue Gas Using a Magnetically Stabilized, Inductively Heated Fluidized Bed Reactor

Award identifier 165344e7a9fb530c8d41cac8aa5c6a450bf8ebde69a323a673c7bff040f6e98aAwarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$250,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2022

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
SUSTEON INC
Proposal award date
2022-06-27
Contract end date
2023-03-26
UEI
NYGGSFNP2A84
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
C54-22b

Research abstract

Susteon, Inc., in collaboration with Ohio State University, proposes to develop a low cost, magnetically stabilized, inductively heated (MSIH) CO2 capture process for NGCC flue gas. Development of low-cost carbon capture technologies for natural gas fired combined cycle (NGCC) plants represent an important pathway to achieve deep decarbonization of power generation sector. Compared to coal-fired power generation plants, natural gas fired power plants are approximately 56% carbon intensive per unit electricity produced. However, if all coal-fired assets were converted into NGCC, the carbon emissions reduction gained falls short of stabilizing atmospheric CO2 concentrations [2]. In 2021, natural gas-fired plants accounted for 37% of the total electricity generated in the US, emitting nearly 653 million metric tons of CO2 to the atmosphere. [3] In order to stabilize atmospheric CO2 concentrations and mitigate the impact of increased GHG emissions, adopting carbon capture technologies for NGCC is required. The proposed process is based on several key innovations in sorbent reaction chemistry, unique inductive heating and flow stabilization by magnetic field, fast cycle time to increase overall sorbent productivity, and scalable reactor design. These innovations manifest into low overall energy penalty for the MSIH process, 1.56 GJ/ton CO2 compared to >2.88 GJ/ton CO2 for current state of the art amines systems. With the low cost of materials of construction, minimal utility requirements, low energy penalty, and low cost of the sorbent, MSIH process can potentially reduce the cost of CO2 capture by >35% for the NGCC flue gas compared to the current technologies. The proposed project seeks to test a 1 kg/day bench-scale MSIH test unit and explore the key parameters that may affect the sorbent regeneration and CO2 capture capacity. Extensive development and optimization of the magnetically enhance sorbent will be performed in preparation for the bench unit testing. The project will also evaluate the commercial potential of the MSIH process by performing a comprehensive process economic analysis based on the experimental data obtained from the testing of the magnetic sorbent in the bench-scale MSIH reactor. In SBIR Phase II, the technology will be scaled up and tested at 50 kg/day of CO2 at a power plant site to advance the technology Readiness Level (TRL) to TRL5.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

11 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2019–2024). Reported award amounts total $4,712,500. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Energy, National Science Foundation

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.