SBIR/STTR Research Award

Plasma Printing of Graphene Composites for EMI Shielding Applications

Award identifier e14105adbeb5b7dc7a8be7c15e4294d0624ff68998516aea951aa5f73b8cc61fAwarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$199,940

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2022

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
SPACE FOUNDRY INC
Proposal award date
2022-06-27
Contract end date
2023-03-26
UEI
UCFGEJKCK285
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
C54-27b

Research abstract

The proposed project will develop a high throughput and facile plasma process for printing graphene-based composites for electromagnetic interference shielding application. The plasma jet printing technique offers a unique capability to deposit conductors and dielectrics with tailored physical, optical, chemical and morphological characteristics. A wide variety of shielding materials are being explored for radiofrequency device applications including metals (copper, silver, nickel etc.) and carbon based materials such as carbon nanotubes and graphene. Electromagnetic interference shielding using metal films suffers from poor chemical resistance, heavy weight, oxidation in humid environment and non-flexibility. Large loading of nanomaterials such as carbon nanotubes and graphene in polymer matrix to obtain desired shielding is expensive and lacks scalability. Thus, there is a need for novel manufacturing technology for electromagnetic interference shielding applications, and direct write printing of highly conductive graphene-based composite film on a range of flat and 3D substrates is proposed here as an ideal solution to obtain efficient shielding performance for all electronic devices. A plasma printing process is proposed for meeting the shielding needs. The specific work plan in Phase I will involve developing suitable inks and plasma process to print graphene-based nanocomposite film, and characterization of the surface morphology and electrical/shielding properties of the printed shielding film and correlation to plasma properties. Commercial Applications and Other Benefits: The global electromagnetic interference shielding market is estimated to be $7.7 billion by 2026. Current methods using a wide range of shielding materials are cumbersome, dependent on capital-intensive equipment and inadequate to meet the shielding demands of ever-increasing number of devices and new technologies. A simple cost effective alternative as the plasma printing offered here is like painting a coating onto the object or device that needs the protection. The approach proposed here has the potential to capture a large share of the market due to its simplicity and low cost.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

7 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2018–2025). Reported award amounts total $1,803,621. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Defense, National Science Foundation, Department of Energy

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.