SBIR/STTR Research Award

IND-Enabling Toxicology for a Novel Ca2+ Channel Therapeutic to Improve Outcomes Associated with Checkpoint Inhibitor Immunotherapy

Award identifier 78ed8fcc3576cb282b614d04637c2fbdfd24924b4db6d0439943729ce229223eAwarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$1,873,040

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2022

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
VIVREON BIOSCIENCES LLC
Proposal award date
2022-06-01
Contract end date
2024-11-30
UEI
P935LHN98ZV9
Solicitation number
PA21-259
Topic code
102

Research abstract

Vivreon Biosciences, LLC 4940 Carroll Canyon Rd. Suite 110 San Diego, CA 92121 milton@vivreonbiosciences.com Vivreon Biosciences, LLC, NCI SBIR Direct to Phase II, Omnibus Solicitation of the NIH, CDC and FDA for Small Business Innovation Research Grant Applications, PA-21-259 IND-Enabling Toxicology for VV2003, a Novel CRAC Channel Therapeutic, to Improve Outcomes Associated with Checkpoint Inhibitor Immunotherapy Project Summary Vivreon Biosciences is pleased to apply for NCI SBIR Solicitation PA-21-259. Vivreon is an innovative life sciences company that is developing a novel small molecule Ca2+ channel inhibitor, VV2003, to improve outcomes in persons undergoing immune checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy. Checkpoint inhibitors have improved overall survival in numerous cancers, but enterocolitis has emerged as the most frequent dose-limiting toxicity associated with these therapies. Checkpoint inhibitor-induced colitis is currently treated with immunosuppressive therapy, which blunts the tumor-killing potential of the checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy and is administered following checkpoint therapy discontinuation. VV2003 is an oral candidate therapeutic designed to selectively and safely block checkpoint inhibitor-induced enterocolitis without systemic immunosuppressive side effects. It is intended to be used concomitantly with checkpoint inhibitors, allowing immunotherapy to continue, separating it from other investigational therapies. Vivreon seeks NCI Phase 2 funding for investigational new drug (IND)-enabling good laboratory practice (GLP) toxicity, safety, and genotoxicity studies. Specifically, NCI funding will go towards dose range finding toxicity studies, two-species GLP 28-day toxicity studies, GLP safety pharmacology and genetic toxicology, GLP pharmacological respiratory safety assessment, and GLP cardiovascular telemetry. Activities in this proposal will run in parallel with chemistry manufacturing and controls (CMC) processes that will be funded by Vivreon’s Seed investor. Completion of these studies will support and be written up in an IND application, with the final milestone being IND submission to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

19 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2016–2025). Reported award amounts total $19,702,937. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.