SBIR/STTR Research Award

Development of 4-(aroylamino)piperidine-based entry inhibitors as anti-influenza therapeutics

Award identifier d5c528b43bfa2415a6b079345560b9e59556693f4db0e4836a459f70a7f28a39Awarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$2,997,972

Program and phase

STTR · Phase II

Award year

2022

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
Chicago Biosolutions, Inc.
Proposal award date
2022-05-05
Contract end date
2025-04-30
UEI
KJL4YQ7KSEK9
Solicitation number
PA20-265
Topic code
NIAID

Research abstract

Influenza A viruses belong to the orthomyxoviridae family, and have a negative-sense, segmented RNA genome, which can cause seasonal or pandemic flu with high morbidity and significant mortality. Vaccination is the most prevalent prophylactic means for controlling influenza infections. However, an effective vaccine usually takes at least six months to develop. Furthermore, vaccination has limited effectiveness in the treatment of immunocompromised patients, and its effectiveness is also limited during a pandemic. The current therapeutic options for flu infections are all based on the neuraminidase inhibitors (NAIs; oseltamivir, zanamivir and peramivir), while the influenza M2 ion channel blockers (amantadine and rimantadine) are not now recommended since all of the circulating influenza strains have acquired resistance. (Xofluza, a polymerase acidic endonuclease inhibitor, has just been approved in 2018 and is yet untried during a flu season.) The rapid emergence of the NAI-resistant strains of influenza A viruses strongly suggests that NAIs alone may not be sufficient as effective therapies, and thus new treatment options targeting the other viral/host factors are urgently needed. This application defines a plan to develop potent, small molecule inhibitors, which block entry of influenza A viruses. We have identified compounds that inhibit entry of infectious influenza A viruses, with IC50 values in the nanomolar range. We have synthesized structurally diverse analogs of the anti-influenza hit series using structure-activity relationships (SARs) to improve potency and selectivity; validated the lead inhibitor candidates in the infectious assay and investigated the mechanism of action (MOA) of the these inhibitors; and selected anti-influenza inhibitors with excellent in vitro potency and selectivity values and druglike in vivo pharmacokinetic properties. In this Fast Track STTR Phase I &II application, we propose four specific aims: (1) optimize the lead scaffold and select development candidates; (2) investigate the mechanism of action (MOA) of the advanced lead compounds with HA proteins; (3) evaluate the pharmacokinetics/toxicokinetics of the advanced lead compounds; and (4) preclinical development.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

8 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2016–2022). Reported award amounts total $8,762,050. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.