SBIR/STTR Research Award

SBIR Phase II: A Novel High Voltage All-Iron Flow Battery for Long-Duration Energy Storage

Award identifier b125602d37cf62ee337163d18d405fe684490da2f74e6d8dd9b07a022e8fa016Awarding agency National Science Foundation

Award amount

$1,250,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2026

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
National Science Foundation
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
VOLTA ENERGY INC
Proposal award date
2026-08-24
Contract end date
2028-08-31
UEI
EEUMAESHYBD5
Solicitation number
NSF 24-580
Topic code
EN

Research abstract

The broader/commercial impact of this SBIR Phase II project is the prototype development of a cost-effective, durable, and efficient all-iron flow battery suitable for long-duration energy storage. Cost-effective storage is a key enabler for power generation from intermittent and weather-dependent sources. For short-duration energy storage, the rapidly improving Lithium-ion batteries are already practical, but flow batteries are needed for long-duration energy storage. The state-of-the-art flow battery technology is the vanadium redox-flow battery, but the high costs and limited supply of vanadium restrict its application also to short-duration energy storage, where Lithium-ion batteries are dominant. The all-iron flow battery is based instead on iron as the active material, offering a potential pathway meeting the cost targets for grid energy transition. This Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Phase II project aims to scale up the all-iron flow battery from the laboratory-scale single cell unit to a modular prototype with a multi-cell stack the size of a small residential energy storage unit. Unlike other all-iron batteries that involve solid metal at the negative electrode and are hybrid batteries, this technology uses all-solution iron complexes for both the posolyte and the negolyte, offering a true flow battery technology based on iron. The Phase II project targets a cell voltage exceeding 1.5 V, overcoming the lower voltages typical of traditional iron-based systems, boosting capacity and round-trip efficiency. By utilizing specialized ligands and tailoring electrolyte pH and composition, the design reduces gas evolution and cross-contamination, essential for stable long-term cycling. The planned work includes optimization of electrolyte composition, cell architecture, and operating conditions in a smaller stack to validate performance demonstrating a low area-specific resistance and durability, before building a larger multi-cell stack and balance-of-plant for a complete bidirectional grid-connected prototype to establish the efficacy of the technology in offering a lower cost alternative with secure supply-chain, enhanced efficiency and modular scalability. This award reflects NSF's statutory mission and has been deemed worthy of support through evaluation using the Foundation's intellectual merit and broader impacts review criteria.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

4 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2023–2026). Reported award amounts total $1,925,000. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: National Science Foundation, Department of Energy

Agency intelligence

National Science Foundation

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.