SBIR/STTR Research Award

CLEAR: RAD suite

Award identifier 1c503c2629150ad6fff6ad4e1f203f96646cd2000a6dbb9998a586e155950e82Awarding agency Department of Defense · Defense Threat Reduction Agency

Award amount

$167,434

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2022

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Defense Threat Reduction Agency
Recipient company
APTIMA INC
Proposal award date
2022-02-07
Contract end date
2022-09-06
UEI
K1GCPNNZKEN7
Solicitation number
21.2
Topic code
DTRA212-007

Research abstract

Radiological and nuclear incidents threaten the health and safety of US. To prepare for the occurrence of these incidents, the Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA) evaluates both commercial and non-commercial systems expected to help Warfighters either prevent the occurrence of a radiological incident or mitigate the damage of a radiological incident that has already occurred. Existing simulator-based methods to evaluate radioactive isotope identification devices (RIIDs) enable users to calculate what a radiation detector will display given the detector’s hardware specifications. What these simulation solutions do not do however, is replicate the experience of using these detectors. As a consequence, when testing RIIDs using these solutions, evaluators are unable to assess the usability of the detectors under dynamic environmental conditions, how well Warfighters are able to integrate potential maintenance requirements (e.g., recalibration and device cooling) for the detector into their workflow, and device usability when supporting multi-person operations. The only way to test these factors, is to setup a real-world environment for device testing. This is a highly controlled test scenario using the actual detectors being assessed and radiological sources. This method enables testing of detectors in a representative real-world environment where the Warfighter’s usage of the device can be monitored. However, real-world testing has significant constraints, is difficult to control (weather and temperature) and is prohibitively expensive, limiting the replicability and scope of testing that can be performed. To provide a low-cost T&E methodology capable of not only supporting system evaluation, but also behavioral, human-factors, and workflow analytics, Aptima will build the CLEAR: RAD Suite, which is a real-time RIID test and evaluation (T&E) solution based on Aptima’s CLEAR modular mixed-reality T&E system. CLEAR: RAD Suite will enable evaluators to rapidly generate synthetic replicas (virtual twins) of real-world RIIDs and evaluate their usage within highly configurable virtual environments supported by a built-in analytics capability that will support data recording, pre-processing, and assessment.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

520 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1997–2025). Reported award amounts total $208,057,185. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Transportation, Department of Energy, Department of Homeland Security

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.