SBIR/STTR Research Award

SBIR Phase II: Affordable, Scalable, and Compostable Solution for Flexible Plastic Packaging

Award identifier b6c4b2fb67de2fdc53a91483a5ee0b0e4292d83b7eae56351aee01798166cde9Awarding agency National Science Foundation

Award amount

$1,146,638

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2026

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
National Science Foundation
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
SWAY INNOVATION CO.
Proposal award date
2026-06-17
Contract end date
2028-06-30
UEI
YJ22N71BJD33
Solicitation number
NSF 24-580
Topic code
AM

Research abstract

The broader/commercial impact of this Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Phase II project centers on developing a plastic alternative that could transform the $289 billion flexible packaging industry. This innovation addresses critical challenges by replacing conventional plastics responsible for billions of packaging items annually that have less than 5% currently recycled, with a compostable material. This technology uses a bioplastic as a primary ingredient in scalable, home-compostable thermoplastic films, which maintain the strength and barrier properties of conventional plastics. Unlike common terrestrial crops used in bioplastics, this technology requires no arable land or fertilizers, making it an abundant and sustainable resource available on coastlines worldwide. Commercially, this technology enables American plastic manufacturers to seamlessly integrate sustainable alternatives using their current equipment, facilitating rapid industry adoption. Successful commercialization is projected to displace over 1.75 million pounds of plastic waste by 2030. The innovation creates economic opportunities in coastal communities while generating substantial benefits including reduced microplastic pollution. Scientifically, this project advances understanding of marine biopolymer processing, demonstrating how these materials can achieve melt-processability, opening new pathways for sustainable material science. The research contributes valuable knowledge to renewable polymer chemistry and packaging innovation, potentially revolutionizing how society approaches plastic waste. This Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Phase II project addresses key scientific challenges in formulating, processing, and scaling novel biopolymer blends for commercial use. The research will develop a tunable thermoplastic system (pellet and film) by modifying composition, processing conditions, and screw design to lower the product cost and improve mechanical properties. The project includes techno-economic and life cycle analyses, pilot-scale testing, end-of-life performance testing, composability testing, and commercialization readiness evaluation. This award reflects NSF's statutory mission and has been deemed worthy of support through evaluation using the Foundation's intellectual merit and broader impacts review criteria.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

2 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2023–2026). Reported award amounts total $1,419,035. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase II, Phase I

Agencies: National Science Foundation

Agency intelligence

National Science Foundation

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.