SBIR/STTR Research Award

SBIR Phase I: Engineering Living Sensors to Reveal Environmental Threats

Award identifier 9f64ede191b0a7e0a7f90c527ea6110ef87157e31503c0ada63cd35c1de040a7Awarding agency National Science Foundation

Award amount

$305,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2026

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
National Science Foundation
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
Living Sensors Inc
Proposal award date
2026-06-17
Contract end date
2027-06-30
UEI
T3GSNEZSXSH8
Solicitation number
NSF 24-582
Topic code
BT

Research abstract

The broader/commercial impact of this Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Phase I project is to improve the ability to detect and manage contamination from per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), a class of persistent industrial chemicals often called “forever chemicals.” PFAS contamination has affected millions of acres of agricultural land in the United States, creating risks for food systems, ecosystems, and rural economies. Current monitoring approaches rely on laboratory testing of soil samples, which is costly and sparse, leaving large areas untested. This project will develop a plant-based environmental sensing system that enables large-scale screening of soils for PFAS contamination. By integrating contamination detection into deployable plant systems, the approach has the potential to generate high-resolution contamination maps, guide remediation efforts, and reduce monitoring costs. The technology combines advances in synthetic biology and remote sensing to create a new class of living diagnostics – living sensors. If successful, this work will enhance scientific understanding of how engineered biological systems can function as distributed sensors while providing a practical tool to improve contaminant monitoring, agricultural resilience, and public health protection. Early markets are expected to include government and industrial site managers who monitor large areas of land potentially affected by PFAS contamination. The proposed project will develop a genetically engineered cover crop capable of detecting specific PFAS compounds in soil and producing a visible signal that can be detected remotely. The project will focus on engineering plant hormone receptor circuits that respond selectively to PFAS molecules and activate a reporter signal in plant tissue. Candidate receptor variants will be designed using computational protein engineering and constructed using high-throughput gene synthesis and directed evolution. These receptors will be integrated into a pennycress cover crop to create sentinel plants that convert molecular detection events into visible signals such as pigment production or autonomous bioluminescence. A remote sensing pipeline using drone or satellite imaging will be developed to detect and map these signals across large areas. This Phase I project will test the feasibility of this approach by engineering PFAS-responsive receptors and validating sensor performance in controlled greenhouse conditions. The anticipated outcome is proof-of-concept validation of a scalable plant-based sensing platform. This award reflects NSF's statutory mission and has been deemed worthy of support through evaluation using the Foundation's intellectual merit and broader impacts review criteria.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Agency intelligence

National Science Foundation

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.