SBIR/STTR Research Award

Levaraging AxM Software Technology to Empower Material Reuse and Embodied Carbon Reporting in the Built Environment

Award identifier bfb84bae3a6ced8ecd27dfacbe92c8a67994a3c95f2b914d9611efd6cb66169fAwarding agency Environmental Protection Agency

Award amount

$93,370

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2022

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Environmental Protection Agency
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
RHEAPLY INC
Proposal award date
2021-12-01
Contract end date
2022-05-31
UEI
XD1NADN7CDT5
Solicitation number
68HERC21R0144
Topic code
4D

Research abstract

As the single largest consumer of materials and energy use worldwide, the construction sector remains a prime target for materials reuse reform. (Krausmann et al., 2009; De Ia Rue du Can & Price, 2008). Construction and ongoing operation of the built environment extracts a significant amount of resources -- and on an ongoing basis. According to the U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC), buildings account for approximately 40% of total energy use, 40% of raw materials use, 30% of waste output, 13.6% of total potable water consumption, 73% of total electricity consumption, and 38% of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (USGBC, 2015). Research, regulatory compliance and even voluntary efforts to lower the built environment’s GHG demand have consistently and aggressively focused on managing, measuring and reporting the energy efficiency lifecycle from design through post-occupancy performance. However, energy efficiency is responsible for only one portion of a building’s GHG emissions; its operational carbon impact. Embodied carbon -- the remaining carbon impact -- derives from the combined GHG emissions caused by extraction, manufacture, transportation, construction, maintenance, replacement, deconstruction, disposal, and end of life activities for the collective materials and systems that comprise a building. Annually, embodied carbon is responsible for 11% of global GHG emissions and 28% of global building sector emissions. Sustainable Materials Management demands a lifecycle approach to promoting environmentally responsible harvesting, management and usage of a quite complex and often-commingled supply chain of resources. In the built environment, this calls for a shift in “cradle to gate” design thinking to “cradle to cradle” design thinking. Rheaply’s Asset Exchange Manager (AxM)TM is a web-based asset management system that employs the bestin- class features on a modern-day online marketplace to increase asset visibility, utilization, and redeployment. On Rheaply’s AxM, construction stakeholders can request and exchange reclaimed building materials. This paper proposes to go beyond typical usage of surplus materials and invest in additional features that will enable AxM to empower decarbonization efforts by reporting on estimated embodied carbon savings related to each transaction of reclaimed materials.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

4 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2019–2022). Reported award amounts total $242,079. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I

Agencies: Department of Defense, Environmental Protection Agency

Agency intelligence

Environmental Protection Agency

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.