SBIR/STTR Research Award

SBIR Phase I: Development of a system for automated pain behavior testing across preclinical disease models in rodents

Award identifier 7e8be36d2c241bc075983a060897cd25e33ae467c2dddaaf1dbf97b52a095e97Awarding agency National Science Foundation

Award amount

$305,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2025

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
National Science Foundation
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
Tactorum Inc.
Proposal award date
2026-01-15
Contract end date
2026-12-31
UEI
L2LVK2JHL226
Solicitation number
NSF 24-579
Topic code
BT

Research abstract

The broader/commercial impact of this Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Phase I project will include fewer resources being needed for pain behavior studies, and fewer mice being needed. The system that results from this project may reduce the time necessary for experiment completion by 50% and training of researchers from 5-6 months to 1 hour, and reduce waste by producing cleaner data faster, saving money, and assisting in research animal use reduction efforts. The complete automation of the system’s operation could further benefit the ~$3.3B global preclinical pain research market while improving the translational viability by generating cleaner data, measuring pain, and not just stimulus sensitivity. By year 3 of production post-award, $1.85 million in revenue is expected from hardware and software products. In addition, this system lowers the impediments and reduces injury potential for researchers who traditionally could not perform pain behavior assays due to their high training requirements or physically demanding nature. This is expected to benefit trainees, spur innovation by allowing new labs to easily access these assays. The proposed project aims to assess the commercial feasibility of a new behavior testing and analysis system for use in preclinical pain research. Preclinical rodent pain research is a key part of the development of new pain-relieving therapies for the 20% of US adults currently living with undertreated chronic pain. Unfortunately, the current gold standard of von Frey testing has significant confounds due to manual aiming and stimulus delivery and suffers from limited behavioral readouts, hurting translatability. The new system eliminates these confounds by automating delivery and using machine learning to measure both high-speed reflexive and affective pain behaviors. This system has only been validated in inflammatory models, but new tools must demonstrate robust validation across various established models to be viable, as validation often makes or breaks new research tools. This project will address this challenge by testing it across three diverse rodent pain models for neuropathy, chemotherapy, and osteoarthritis, comparing it to von Frey. This project will then use the resulting data to determine if a new version of this automated analysis strategy, combining 3D tracking with machine learning behavior identification, can overcome previous accuracy limitations to create the groundwork for a commercially viable analysis software product. This award reflects NSF's statutory mission and has been deemed worthy of support through evaluation using the Foundation's intellectual merit and broader impacts review criteria.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Agency intelligence

National Science Foundation

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.