SBIR/STTR Research Award

A Photo-based Menstrual Blood Loss Metric

Award identifier 191b3c7d527e720d38d855218a88bb72fa4ac44aab24175c3316b069ee400f63Awarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$2,047,729

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Award year

2021

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
Theranova LLC
Proposal award date
2021-09-23
Contract end date
2024-08-31
UEI
PWMHH9QT8P93
Solicitation number
PA19-272
Topic code
NICHD

Research abstract

Abstract In the United States, approximately 30% of reproductive aged women suffer from AUB and the associated symptom of heavy uterine bleeding (menorrhagia), a menstrual disorder that drastically impairs quality of life and has an annual economic burden of $37 billion. Women afflicted by AUB experience limitations in social, physical, and leisure activities, and incur a substantial personal financial burden due to work absence and home management costs (rt$2,000 per year). Despite the high prevalence of this medical condition, clinicians rely on women who are distressed by their menses to give a subjective self-assessment of their menstrual blood loss (MBL), which has proven to be unreliable for accurate diagnosis and can lead to unnecessary surgery. Given that these symptoms account for one-third of all office visits to the gynecologist, choosing an appropriate treatment course is critical for providing high-quality care to Americans. Current methods for quantifying MBL have key drawbacks that limit their use. Alkaline hematin (AH) testing is the standard required by regulatory bodies for objective quantification of MBL. Unfortunately, AH testing is impractical for routine clinical practice as it is expensive (~$1000 per cycle) and has poor acceptability, requiring patients to collect all used sanitary products and mail them to a lab facility for analysis. While pictorial blood loss assessment charts (PBLACs) offer a less costly, semi-quantitative method for MBL quantification, they demonstrate a high rate of false positive results (~59%), which leads to the over-diagnosis of menorrhagia. To address the need for a cost-effective, easy- to-use, and objective method to quantify MBL in premenopausal women, TheraNova has developed a cell phone- based diagnostic tool, the electronic MBL Diary (eMBLD). Previously, in a proof of concept clinical study, we demonstrated a strong correlation between eMBLD and AH testing, the gold-standard method for objective quantification of MBL. The goals of this Phase II proposal are to determine the effectiveness of our device for accurately diagnosing menorrhagia. First, we will verify the sensitivity of the image processing algorithm to accurately quantify MBL in women with both normal and heavy menses (Specific Aim 1). Second, we will conduct a pivotal clinical study to validate the effectiveness of eMBLD for diagnosing menorrhagia (Specific Aim 2). The data obtained will support FDA 510(k) clearance and will allow us to commercialize the system within four years of the funding of this proposal.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

25 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2011–2024). Reported award amounts total $20,699,399. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.