SBIR/STTR Research Award

XTG Smart Tag System for Modernizing EMATT Supply Chain Tracking and Tracing

Award identifier ccc2cf704ff19921b2f4f36d6004f4cb625b316a84959e8b9b6d3d8559aa23a4Awarding agency Department of Defense · Defense Logistics Agency

Award amount

$99,931

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2021

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Defense Logistics Agency
Recipient company
H NU Photonics LLC
Proposal award date
2021-09-16
Contract end date
2022-03-15
UEI
UXZFTD5JG237
Solicitation number
21.2
Topic code
DLA212-002

Research abstract

The MK39 Expendable Mobile Anti-Submarine Training Target (EMATT) has become a vital tool in the Navy’s Anti- Submarine Warfare (ASW) tool kit by providing a low cost, expendable, open ocean, programmable, and modular training target, capable of simulating numerous types of submarine signatures and behaviors in the field for the training of submarine, aircraft, & ship crews in the search, detection & tracking of submarines. Since its initial development, the US Navy and other defense partners have utilized tens of thousands of units of the MK 39 EMATT vehicle for such testing and training of anti-submarine warfare platforms and personnel. Nearly 5,000 EMATT units were procured from Lockheed Martin by defense partners within the last 5 years alone, with production volumes continuing to increase each year. However, as new technologies and innovations are implemented into the EMATT platform’s acoustic systems, tail section propulsion, payloads, and sensors it has become increasingly complex to differentiate between the myriad of potential vehicle and section options, performance and endurance capabilities, battery status, and shelf life. Compounding this problem even further is the fact that the outer hulls and packaging of EMATT vehicles are visually indistinguishable from one another despite the wide variety of internal hardware configurations. To manage all of the potential variabilities in hardware, programmable software options within an EMATT vehicle, and ensure that each EMATT vehicle’s configuration conforms to the requisite training mission set, detailed system information for each unit must be readily accessible by the operators of the EMATT in the field. This will require a truly exceptional track and trace system chronicling each EMATT unit and its programmable settings over the entire history of production from component and subsystem integration to programming installation to final EMATT deployment, launch and recovery. HNu Photonics is proud to present its revolutionary XTG smart label track and trace technologies as a solution to these issues of tracking, monitoring, and authenticating of mission operations for unmanned underwater vehicle systems such as the EMATT throughout the production supply chain and field operations.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

17 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2010–2025). Reported award amounts total $10,544,654. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.