SBIR/STTR Research Award

Bio-inspired Energy Dissipating Structures for Enhanced Airdrop Capabilities

Award identifier ef8e3a313f19ecee85b59897dabe7dcd285e690a552917851f3c5a36056991f2Awarding agency Department of Defense · Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency

Award amount

$1,799,923

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2026

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
Recipient company
PHYSICAL SCIENCES INC.
Proposal award date
2025-12-10
Contract end date
2029-01-07
UEI
RMG1AZ1ZH8Q7
Solicitation number
24.4
Topic code
HR0011SB20244-03

Research abstract

Physical Sciences Inc. and George Mason University developed a biomimetic approach to produce novel energy dissipating biopolymer foams produced from upcycled cellulosic waste feedstocks. After the completion of a successful Phase I SBIR program, the team proposes a subsequent Phase II program to mature and demonstrate the technology validated in Phase I. The team has successfully demonstrated the feasibility of the developed foam materials in a 6-month Phase I SBIR program. This 100% bioderived biopolymer foam made from cellulosic waste feedstocks was integrated into novel, bio-mimetic form factors and demonstrated high energy dissipation characteristics. The Phase I results achieved a >7.5X improvement in SEA from state-of-the-art (SOA) paper honeycomb. The team performed a preliminary techno-economic analysis that shows PSI’s technology has a 1.1-5.3X reduction in material cost compared to commercially available paper honeycomb. The Phase II Base program seeks to enhance material properties to achieve a specific energy absorption (SEA) of > 40 J/g EDS at normal impacts, and > 20 J/g EDS when impacted at a 30° incline. The team will incrementally scale-up the material production, creating 6” x 6” test coupons to demonstrate mechanical properties. In the Phase II Option, the team will further scale up the Energy Dissipating Structure (EDS) production to create a proof-of-concept full size (36”x96”) foam panel and demonstrate its mechanical properties at scales relevant to airdrop applications. Additionally, PSI will produce a detailed design and plan for constructing and operating a pilot plant capable of producing one full size EDS panel per hour. The team will build the pilot plant and operate it to generate at least 10 full-sized EDS panels over a fabrication campaign. This SBIR program will enable a scalable, domestically produced enhanced material for U.S. air drop capabilities across the world. PSI’s foam material will increase air drop mission success rates, providing efficient airborne and airlift operations to resupply missions, unit deployments, and humanitarian aid.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

1,763 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1983–2026). Reported award amounts total $698,949,224. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Energy, National Science Foundation, Environmental Protection Agency

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.