SBIR/STTR Research Award

The ScreenVane Family of Inlet Distortion Generators for Ground Based Testing of Fans, Compressors and Engines

Award identifier 2c1ccbad524b6cce4d204df28f7c45fabe0ccf367ba5c25711d18892fac8fb9fAwarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$749,889

Program and phase

STTR · Phase II

Award year

2021

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
Technology In Blacksburg Inc
Proposal award date
2021-08-05
Contract end date
2022-11-09
UEI
CLLECDWG5CK6
Solicitation number
X20.C
Topic code
AF20C-TCSO1

Research abstract

Due to requirements to minimize radar cross-sections, most modern turbine engines of military aircraft are coupled with offset diffusers that create significant fan face distortion. Conceptual blended-wing/body commercial aircraft also create distortion challenges. In order to fully understand the effects of complex inlet distortions on conventional fan and compressor designs, a range of inlet distortions needs to be processed through the compression system and evaluated for performance impacts. The ScreenVaneTM family of distortion generators provides the necessary testing capability. The technology has been under development at Virginia Tech for nearly 10 years and has advanced to a high TRL. However, acceptance for ground-based engine testing has been limited. To address this issue, Virginia Tech has teamed with Techsburg, Inc. to better commercialize the product. Through their joint STTR Phase I effort, the team identified structural integrity as the primary hurdle to broader acceptance of the technology and quality of the resulting distortion pattern as the second issue. The objective of the proposed Phase II effort is to address both matters. Despite being design to high static factors of safety, analysis of previous test results showed that high-risk applications could lead to failure through flutter. To avoid this potential problem, the Phase II effort aims to develop a safety criteria for preventing flutter, analysis methods to evaluate the criteria and designs methods to insure the criteria is met. The biggest remaining challenge in designing accurate distortion patterns is the impact of structural support screens required for mounting distortion generating screens of ScreenVanesTM. These so called “backer screens” interact with the lower porosity profile-producing screens resulting in a composite loss distribution that remains inadequately modeled. The design system will be extended to accommodate many commonly used backer screen configurations by acquiring experimental data on a range of porosities in combination with the existing portfolio of lower porosity screens, thus, addressing most customers’ needs empirically.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

43 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1998–2025). Reported award amounts total $14,258,989. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.