SBIR/STTR Research Award

Digital engineering framework for seeker model evaluation in hypersonic environments

Award identifier 2f87f914ba6e80f1104705320631637fdf4a7e084f2ba0dc9f66d43f1a2c3859Awarding agency Department of Defense · Navy

Award amount

$239,872

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2021

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Navy
Recipient company
CFD Research Corporation
Proposal award date
2021-08-02
Contract end date
2022-11-07
UEI
V3KCP1HNFM33
Solicitation number
21.1
Topic code
N211-097

Research abstract

Hypersonic vehicles provide the ability to pursue targets at very high speeds and long ranges, making them a critical offensive and defensive technology. As such, DoD has identified the ability to develop and field hypersonic missile systems as one of their top priorities. To achieve precision guidance for these vehicles, improved radar guidance systems are needed to meet the accuracy and rate requirements for target detection and recognition in high-speed flight. Design and evaluation of these radar systems is complicated by the harsh operating conditions associated with hypersonic weapons. High-speed flight causes aerothermal load induced deformation of the radome, material dielectric constant changes, and ablation of thermal protective systems (among other effects), which affect the transmission performance of the radome-antenna system. Computational modeling is key to addressing the design challenges associated with hypersonic radar seeker subsystems, because experimental testing is expensive and access to the few hypersonic facilities is competitive. To address these needs, the overall goal of this effort is to develop a Hypersonic Digital Engineering Testbed for Evaluating ConcepT Radars (HyDETECTR). The testbed will include high-fidelity engineering-level modeling and simulation tools to capture the aerothermal, aerothermoelastic, and electromagnetic effects on radar concepts. Integrated configurable modeling will be supported through interface and data standardization. Real-time approximation models will be trained through surrogate modeling to provide a rapid evaluation mechanism that can be used to integrate the hypersonic interference effects on the radar in engagement-level scenarios and vignettes. In Phase I, the framework will be developed for the engineering-level analysis. Feasibility and capability will be demonstrated via case studies of DoD interest. Phase II efforts will focus on capability extension, model optimization, engagement-level integration, extensive technology validation and insertion into Navy radar concept evaluation workflow.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

947 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1987–2026). Reported award amounts total $350,893,199. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Health and Human Services, National Science Foundation, Department of Commerce, Department of Energy

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.