SBIR/STTR Research Award

Development of a Fatty Acid Emulsifiable Concentrate Formulation as a Biopesticide for Livestock Fly Control

Award identifier ec4a12755f4e15fe0dd9e43faa4cee5091226d3ad529387d53e477ecf2e3c882Awarding agency Department of Agriculture

Award amount

$640,976

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2021

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Agriculture
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
STRATACOR INC
Proposal award date
2021-07-29
Contract end date
2023-08-31
UEI
P68FW9VEMDA3
Solicitation number
USDA-NIFA-SBIR-008096
Topic code
8.300000000000001

Research abstract

Development of a Fatty Acid Emulsifiable Concentrate Formulation as a Biopesticide for Livestock Fly control ABSTRACT While medium chain fatty acids (octanoic nonanoic and decanoic acids called C8910) are generally regarded as safe (GRAS) they have contact insecticidal activities against certain insects and arthropods. This activity can be increased by increasing the dose but higher doses can result in greater potential for skin and eye irritation when exposed to mammals and increased phytotoxicity when exposed to plants. This study was undertaken to increase the pesticidal potency of the fatty acids by formulation in aqueous emulsion along with adjuvant. Compared to a mineral oil formulation of C8910 previously registered with the US EPA for livestock fly control the aqueous emulsion formulations had significantly lower skin absorption and higher residue on the skin surface where the fatty acids must remain to affect the flies. Following this Phase I finding we focused on emulsions of a 2 component mix of octanoic and decanoic acids (C8C10) as actives since laboratory studies had shown that C8C10 had equal or better pesticidal activity vs. stable flies as compared to the 3 component fatty acid mix (C8910). Further a C8C10 formulation was successfully registered with OMRI for organic production. The inclusion of a proprietary adjuvant with the C8C10 formulations increased pesticidal performance and residual activity. While the adjuvant had no known pesticidal activity by itself and lab tests with 1% adjuvant in distilled water showed little or no insecticidal effect lab tests with house flies stable flies horn flies and cockroaches demonstrated that insect incapacitation was more rapid and mortality (incapacitation at 24 hours post treatment) was significantly higher when the adjuvant was present in the fatty acid formulation. Performance against permethrin resistant stable and horn flies was also increased. A University of Arkansas field study evaluated C8C10 in automated sprayers with and without adjuvant versus horn flies on pastured cattle. The addition of adjuvant (formulation No. XPS-144) gave more rapid fly control compared to the fatty acids alone (XPS-143); XPS-144 had equivalent efficacy to permethrin/PBO during the spray period (94-98% control) but with greater residual efficacy (XPS-144 maintained horn fly count below the economic injury level 1 week after cessation of spraying while permethrin/PBO fly count rose to control levels above 300 flies/animal). A similar study in the central valley of California using manual sprayers demonstrated greater residual efficacy when the adjuvant was present maintaining horn fly numbers at about 100/animal well below the economic injury threshold . In conclusion these Phase I results demonstrated that good fly control can be provided with C8C10 formulations with adjuvant whether used in manual sprayers or in an automated device (Fig 1). Phase II studies will determine the minimum concentration and/or spray frequency of XPS-144 necessary for adequate fly control. A concentrate corresponding to XPS-144 will be developed. Laboratory studies will investigate the residual effect of the adjuvant.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

7 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1997–2021). Reported award amounts total $1,357,192. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Agriculture, Department of Education, Department of Health and Human Services

Agency intelligence

Department of Agriculture

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.