SBIR/STTR Research Award

Spread Spectrum Time Domain Reflectometry for In-situ Monitoring of Cable Insulation

Award identifier b7906ff1d47e6f5cbd4d8ebb8c589fe468202b78f03d9c1a85b6cae7ae93aef1Awarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$200,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2021

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
Livewire Innovation, Inc.
Proposal award date
2021-06-28
Contract end date
2022-06-27
UEI
G2VJTHWJDNR7
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
39e

Research abstract

In-situ cable monitoring methods are needed for management of aging cables in nuclear power plants (NPP). The NRC Regulatory Guide 1.218 maintenance rule requires NPPs to establish a cable condition monitoring program. Additional requirements are specified for second license renewal (SLR) through the Aging Management Programs (AMPS). Inaccessible cables, those routed underground through ducts, trenches, conduits, etc. must be tested for insulation degradation. The AMPS call for “Monitoring and Trending” at 6-year intervals to provide information on the rate of cable insulation degradation. Methods used today require the system to be de-energized and cables to be disconnected. We will provide a new type of tester for cable integrity that can be used in-situ while the system is energized, thus enabling better monitoring and trending of cable health and integrity. This system will be capable of long-term or instantaneous monitoring of cable insulation and will both detect and locate degradation across the entire cable, or in localized regions. It can be used on either energized or de-energized cables and will not damage the cable. Once installed, the system will test the cable integrity, insulation integrity, and the electrical health of components directly connected to the cable, without requiring the system to be de- energized or cables / devices to be disconnected / reconnected for testing. The system may also be used to verify the integrity of the cables and electrical interconnect system at the time of installation or after maintenance actions (planned or unplanned). The enabling technology for the EIT is spread spectrum time domain reflectometry (SSTDR), which has been used for fault location on live electrical systems. Initial tests shown that SSTDR can determine the electrical properties and health of cables and their insulation. In Phase I, LiveWire will (1) collect SSTDR signature data on an energized nuclear cabling test bed at PNNL, (2) use this data to evaluate the feasibility of SSTDR insulation integrity evaluation (tan-delta, dielectric constant, etc.), (3) evaluate the maintenance requirements/processes needed to make an embedded product feasible. We will evaluate methods to convert the SSTDR signatures into cable integrity measures (tan-delta, etc.) related to AMPS and NRC maintenance regulations.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

8 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2004–2021). Reported award amounts total $4,371,841. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, Department of Energy

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.