SBIR/STTR Research Award

Economical Thermal Transfer Media for Generation 3 Concentrating Solar Power System with High Durability

Award identifier 29487fb213777eedabc0889a92af5e94978f8937a4afc48f92ae3563c0fa2c5eAwarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$199,986

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2021

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
ADVANCED MATERIALS SCIENTIA LLC
Proposal award date
2021-06-28
Contract end date
2022-03-27
UEI
K97TSFXD4JP1
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
16h

Research abstract

The Department of Energy seeks a solution for the improved components for the next generation of Concentrating Solar Thermal Power (CSP) generation technologies. While there are many CSP system components, the thermal transfer fluid can be an excellent cost reduction candidate. The current state-of-art of the thermal transfer solid in the CSP system's particle receiver is the ceramic proppant. The proppant has high solar absorptivity and durability at high temperature. However, its high cost (1-2 $/kg) is a major hurdle to be continuously used as the transfer media. Due to this high cost, the proppant has limited use as only transfer, not for thermal energy storage. To overcome the problem, we propose a novel thermal particle that is economical and highly durable at 1,000oC. The particle has a multifunction that can be a thermal energy transferrable vehicle from the sunlight receiver tower and a direct storable medium in a thermal energy storage (TES) system. The particle is a silica-based material, which is an economical material and has the high thermal storage capability, and iron oxide will be added to the silica sand. The added iron oxide will enhance the solar absorptivity to transfer the thermal energy. We project the new technology will decrease LCOE to 0.059 $/kW-hr. This reduction LCOE is extremely close to the Department of Energy Solar Energy Technologies Office (SETO) goal by 2030 (0.050 $/kW-hr). In Phase I, we will develop the low-cost thermal particle around 0.05 $/kg, demonstrate its high durability at 1,000℃ as well as its durability, and outline the preliminary design and cost of installation of the prototype in the CSP-TES system. Once the project is carried over into Phase II or Phase III and beyond, the application will target the thermal energy storage market. This multifunctional thermal particle will transfer the concentrated sunlight from the particle receiver to the thermal storage system. The particle will be used as the storage media. Since the proposed particle has low-cost and high durability, the levelized cost of energy (LCOE) will be reduced to <0.059 $/kW-hr from 0.065 $/kW-hr. The reduction of LCOE will be close to the SETO’s 2030 goal (0.05 $/kW-hr). This technology will demonstrate the synergetic effect by combining the concentrating solar power components.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

3 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2021–2025). Reported award amounts total $1,555,974. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Energy

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.