SBIR/STTR Research Award

ECCCHO: Effective Combat Casualty Care Handoff Operations

Award identifier 77ca0d3bbe05a6435e4364d8a635cb2a1846ecb1a21c70d3d08a8e51838faaafAwarding agency Department of Defense · Defense Health Agency

Award amount

$1,695,661

Program and phase

STTR · Phase II

Award year

2021

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Defense Health Agency
Recipient company
TIER 1 PERFORMANCE SOLUTIONS LLC
Proposal award date
2021-04-05
Contract end date
2022-08-04
UEI
SQLGQDFWBJ51
Solicitation number
17.B
Topic code
DHA17B-002

Research abstract

According to the Joint Commission, approximately 70% of sentinel events in medical care are related to communication mishaps, and despite regular and frequent occurrence, poor communication during patient handoffs (i.e., transfer of patient care information, responsibility, and authority from one provider to another) remains a major contributor to medical errors (Nether, 2017; The Joint Commission, 2017, SEA 58). These estimates are based on the 21,000 health care organizations accredited by the Joint Commission but ignore errors in combat casualty where these numbers are likely to be higher due to the harsh nature of combat environments. Why do patient handoffs matter? Patient handoffs are critical for facilitating and informing decisions about the next level of care and can impact treatment throughout the continuum of care. A standardized approach can help mitigate known risks related to information loss. In addition, the written information transferred during a handoff serves as a patient record. This record informs the patient’s long-term care and determines disability benefits for life. Handoffs are conducted by teams of at least two; and in combat casualty care, there are many known challenges. First, these teams could have little or no previous interactions and may even involve transport teams with no medical background, further complicating communication and coordination of care. Operational experience suggests that context/environment, experience, expertise, and state of the individuals involved in the care of the wounded are among the many factors that could affect successful handoff. These factors impact the way in which information is captured and communicated, which drive the success of the handoff. Imagine a common scenario in recent engagements involving a Marine unit on a foot patrol in Afghanistan—one explosion, then another. This routine procedure of transferring care from one provider to another is fraught with challenges. On the bird, the medic gives the patient more morphine because he appears to be in extreme pain. Unfortunately, the patient immediately deteriorates as his heart slows and blood pressure drops. The patient dies due to a combination of morphine overdose and blood loss. The ultimate goal of this proposed work is to improve combat survivability and reduce preventable deaths by focusing on the challenges that revolve around communication during patient handoffs in combat situations. Products of this work will be a patient handoff protocol based on science and operational requirements and associated training linked to existing Tactical Combat Casualty (TCCC) training. The Effective Combat Casualty Care Handoff Operations (ECCCHO) protocol incorporates the science of effective team communications as well as current best practices in the field. Associated ECCCHO training was developed based on adult learning principles and operational training constraints.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

39 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2009–2024). Reported award amounts total $17,399,448. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Science Foundation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Homeland Security, Department of Energy

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.