SBIR/STTR Research Award

Technology to Assist with Lifting, Moving and Holding 0 to 40 Pounds

Award identifier a78dcc51c3cfc251aadf7d2a81a28539697237ec37b9323ca987d20fe4db1eb6Awarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$750,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2021

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
Custom Manufacturing & Engineering, Inc
Proposal award date
2021-04-01
Contract end date
2023-04-01
UEI
J137X5SJTEG9
Solicitation number
18.3
Topic code
AF183-019

Research abstract

To increase productivity and reduce lost time in aerospace sustainment community, the development of this industrial scale passive exoskeleton system will enable the mitigation of operator fatigue, work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs), and hand arm vibration syndrome (HAVS) during power tool corrosion removal and repair maintenance at ICBM launch facility (LF) silos and other industrial maintenance environments.  Based on topic requirements, further requirements analysis, and a responsive conceptual design approach, during Phase I we developed ergonomic-based 3D CAD design models for a novel system of systems approach that is not available today in any current COTS industrial exoskeleton solution. The design is called Passive Universal Maintenance Assist Industrial Exoskeleton (PUMA I-Exo) with integral vibration dampening and will augment the human body and natural movements while performing agile lift/hold/move actions for various tools or other objects weighing 0 to 40 lb. End of arm power tools have different shapes, weights, sensitivity to vibration, pressure and electromagnetic fields, etc., and these are accommodated by quick interchange coupling.  The design is also focused on a ruggedized, flexible/modular solution for environmental conditions (e.g., operating temp. -40 to 140°F, sun, rain, snow, winds up to 60 mph, dust, explosive atmospheres, inside buildings, etc.). Depending on the maintainer’s need for lower body support, the wearer can choose to wear or not wear the lower body module. The Phase II proof of concept prototype will be fabricated and tested in an operational environment to demonstrate successful augmentation of the human body’s ability to lift/hold/move objects while keeping the natural range of motion. A preliminary hazard analysis will be completed and testing will be conducted to verify and validate conformance to performance and functional requirements.  As terrain can be smooth to rough at ICBM LF sites, our unique creeper design provides a unique maintainer aid and station mount for torque arms and the third arm can also be station mounted to creeper, work cage, or workbench. The preliminary BCA/ROI will be updated during Phase II based on the final installation-ready prototype design.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

30 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1999–2025). Reported award amounts total $7,523,121. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, Department of Transportation, Department of Agriculture, National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.