SBIR/STTR Research Award

SBIR Phase I: Phage-amplified Identification and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test

Award identifier 3aca02e30a5d44fafa052bf58932e520b1c1970329dabf224b9fdc8fad064803Awarding agency National Science Foundation

Award amount

$256,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2021

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
National Science Foundation
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
COBIO DIAGNOSTICS INC.
Proposal award date
2021-04-01
Contract end date
2022-03-31
UEI
DNNKH7TPCUG3
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
BT

Research abstract

The broader impact/commercial potential of this Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Phase I project will be the development of new diagnostic tools that allow rapid, direct-from-specimen bloodstream infection testing in clinical settings. The new technological innovations proposed here will more quickly identify bacteria responsible for the vast majority of blood infections while providing vital phenotypic data on antibiotics and dosages effective for treating these infections. This will improve patient outcomes through faster diagnosis and more precise antibiotic selection while also helping to combat the growing incidence of multidrug-resistant infections by reducing broad prescription of these drugs, which is critical to efforts to preserve the usefulness of existing antibiotics. The proposed project will develop a new tests for direct-from-specimen identification (ID), antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) and minimum inhibitory drug concentration (MIC) determination against Escherichia coli in blood. A significant limitation with existing standards-of-care is time required for actionable results; current approaches require 18-72 hrs. Due to the time required, physicians must make empiric antimicrobial therapy decisions that often lead to negative patient outcomes. Genotypic approaches are limited because of the varied mechanisms utilized by bacteria to evolve resistance, which can lead to false-negative results. Mass spectrometry requires colony isolation and provides ID only. Other time-consuming tests are then required for AST and MIC. Rapid phenotypic approaches are needed. To solve these problems, bacteriophage mixtures will be used that are highly specific and have demonstrated overlapping host ranges from component phages, produce a measurable signal quickly, and are well-suited to a simple automatable 96-well plate immunoassay. Project objectives of are to: 1) develop a rapid ID and AST/MIC immunoassay using phage-specific antibodies, and 2) prove feasibility of direct-from-specimen testing in blood samples. Side-by-side comparison to the current standard-of-care diagnostic strategies will also be performed. Anticipated results include ID, AST, and quantitative MIC in less than 5 hours directly in blood. This award reflects NSF's statutory mission and has been deemed worthy of support through evaluation using the Foundation's intellectual merit and broader impacts review criteria.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

4 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2020–2024). Reported award amounts total $3,316,665. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase II, Phase I

Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services, National Science Foundation

Agency intelligence

National Science Foundation

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.