SBIR/STTR Research Award

FerroElectric Generator Development for Prime Power Supply (A19-144)

Award identifier 314980ebbfc19cb8138d46457b51c2e180cb0b0f8a0103f0974c8ccba8abed7bAwarding agency Department of Defense · Army

Award amount

$536,151

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2021

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Army
Recipient company
INTEGRATED APPLIED SCIENCE, LLC
Proposal award date
2021-03-12
Contract end date
2022-09-30
UEI
K2LADLNDAGL4
Solicitation number
19.3
Topic code
A19-144

Research abstract

The primary technical objective for the Phase II research is to demonstrate a functional FEG-based prime power supply suitable for driving very compact, directed-energy systems at TRL-6. The US Army has programs that require on-demand, primary power supplies in very restrictive environments.  These power supplies must be capable of supplying voltages as high as 60 to 70 kV.  The energy outputs must be 5 joules or more.  The active time for this power supply is ≤10 ms for increased reliability and circuit compatibility.  Mission requirements require that the power supply must be quiescent and stable under most environments.  When activated, the lead time needs to be ≤10 us.  Mission size restrictions suggest a total geometry volume of ≈25 in3.  Therefore, the Army is seeking prime power supply designs appropriate for several classes of directed-energy munitions.  While multi-use power supplies are desirable, a single-shot power supply design will satisfy all requirements of the solicitation. From the answers to questions to the sponsor, we know that the load for this power supply is a capacitor.  Given the required energy of 5 J, the size of this capacitor is ~2 nF, if the charge voltage is 70 kV.  Since a single-use power supply is acceptable, one can then consider using an explosive-driven power supply.  With the volume restriction, a Flux Compression Generator (FCG) is ruled out for two reasons.  First, an FCG is not, of itself, a prime power source, and second, including the prime power for a small capacitor with a needed volume for the FCG would simply be too large to fit the volume requirement.  Another possibility would be a FerroMagnetic Generator.  While an FMG can certainly be used as prime power, the energy available from the FMG is too small to satisfy the solicitation requirement without amplification, and the FMG volume will likely be about the stated volume – without room for an amplifier stage.  Additionally, FMGs are typically considered current sources, with associated lower impedances.  Finally, a FerroElectric Generator (FEG) should supply the electrical requirements, but only if the basic FEG is redesigned to more efficiently use the ferroelectric material for charge extraction at higher voltage, while avoiding generator breakdown – historically a limiting factor for energy delivery.  Further, an FEG can be designed to fit into the volume specified.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

2 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2020–2021). Reported award amounts total $703,008. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase II, Phase I

Agencies: Department of Defense

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.