SBIR/STTR Research Award

High-resolution Magnetic Resonance Sensors for In-situ Measurements of Soil Hydrogeology at Coastal Interfaces

Award identifier 0bbcf03900a81ef0cb0dfdb9c66d6d2cae4570dc548f4b7a7e4474915f690371Awarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$256,500

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2021

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
VISTA CLARA INC.
Proposal award date
2021-02-22
Contract end date
2021-11-21
UEI
D79AAHFJ1L56
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
29a

Research abstract

This proposal addresses the challenge of robustly and efficiently measuring processes and structures associated with soil hydrogeology and subsurface biogeochemistry at coastal interfaces. We will develop NMR sensors capable of performing high-resolution measurements of soil properties from the pore-scale to the site-scale. With current technology, shallow NMR measurements are frequently limited by insufficient signal and excess noise. Next generation detection modules will be developed for high-sensitivity, noise-immunity and robust performance across a wide range of environmental conditions. Sensor configurations will include non-invasive surface modules as well as in-situ probes. These tools will be designed for limited-access manual surveying and eventually for remote monitoring. The Phase 1 tasks will establish the feasibility of sensors that have significantly enhanced sensitivity (signal amplitude) and noise-immunity. We will design a functional prototypes of a unilateral magnet sensor that can be used for non-invasive profiling in the upper 30cm, an in-situ probe for depth profiling of several meters, and hardware/software architectures for noise-rejection. We will test the technology at local field sites and, in the final month, will carry out demonstrations at a coast interface site of current interest to DOE Office of Science. Completion of this technology in Phase 2 and beyond will deliver robust and efficient soil sensors for both small- and large-scale site characterization. NMR measurements will allow efficient determination of key soil parameters that cannot be easily measured by other methods, and which are key to controlling groundwater flow and storage. For the DOE coastal systems initiative, these measurements will be of critical value to improve biogeochemical and reactive transport models related to nutrient loading and cycling, processes that have profound effect on ecosystems, coastal economies, and global climate. Characterization of shallow soils is also a critical challenge in commercial markets of environmental management and geotechnical engineering and this technology will be readily transitioned for those complementary commercial purposes.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

32 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2003–2025). Reported award amounts total $20,275,761. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase II, Phase I

Agencies: Department of Energy, Department of Defense, National Science Foundation

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.