SBIR/STTR Research Award

Advanced controls framework enabled through data science

Award identifier 4ab229b39bcbb049c0c030f664bb25280bb8507954f1c6cfbb8d72d2f42a1425Awarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$199,835

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2021

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
Element Aero, L.L.C.
Proposal award date
2021-02-22
Contract end date
2021-11-21
UEI
DAHNE335ZHZ9
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
37f

Research abstract

To accommodate advanced data science applications to particle accelerators and their user experiments and other applications, there is a need for advanced diagnostic sensors as well as for advanced controls. In particular, there is need to create a modern runtime environment conducive with facility control systems such as EPICS while enabling advanced data science methods, such as passing sensor data to advanced optimization-based and/or AI-based algorithms to predict an action for tuning or for “dialing in” the machine configuration to achieve a certain beam parameter (e.g. luminosity, emittance, energy spread) at a particular location. To achieve this, we need to create a seamless link between facility control systems, such as EPICS, and their protocols, the new data science techniques (to analyze and “write” the machine action back through these protocols), a method to display the data and analyses for the operator, and a way to pull from the systems-based engineering models (e.g. surrogate models). The need for a flexible runtime environment to enable data science applications will only become more important as future particle accelerators become more complex. We should address this here and now. With our team consisting of members from Element Aero, the Facility for Rare Isotope Beams at Michigan State University, and the Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility, we plan to architect, design, simulate, and test an extendable framework to process and display real time accelerator data in Phase I of the grant at two nuclear physics accelerator facilities. In Phase II, it is the intent of refining the system and delivering a prototype device. Then we would move into Phase III – the commercialization phase. What we can design and develop here will be of utility not only to many accelerators, but industries with complex systems also having the same goals. Imagine for example that these frameworks could help “dial in” quickly for the high-throughput sterilization of a variety (different machine configurations) of medical devices coming off the production line requiring packaging or could help hospitals remotely treat cancerous tumors in rural areas with fewer highly-skilled medical professionals through data being displayed real time to help tune the machine for a specific patient.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

2 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2021). Reported award amounts total $324,775. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I

Agencies: Department of Defense, Department of Energy

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.