SBIR/STTR Research Award

Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Engine Optimization

Award identifier 58fca9ec76edf650f99b5e4173d03ae4c57331e2a022be76312946e704615bbaAwarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$49,949

Program and phase

STTR · Phase I

Award year

2021

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
NANOCOATINGS INC
Proposal award date
2021-02-04
Contract end date
2021-05-08
UEI
WFJ4MSJTWTM5
Solicitation number
X20.C
Topic code
AF20C-TCSO1

Research abstract

NanoCoatings, Inc. (NCI) and our non-profit team member, Southwest Research Institute (SwRI), propose a complete in-cylinder engine enhancement for Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) multi-fuel engines.  NCI will demonstrate a novel high-voltage anodize process, termed Plasma-Electrolytic-Oxidation (PEO) with specific solid-lubricant nanoparticle additives (e.g., graphite or MoS2), on cast-Al alloy cylinder material to significantly reduce friction and wear.  Coupled with this unique NCI PEO processing method, SwRI will apply their high Technology Readiness Level (TRL 5-6) Plasma-Enhanced Magnetron Sputtered (PEMS) nanocoating (e.g., TiSiCN and diamondlike carbon (DLC)) to piston ring material.  This combination of a PEO-treated solid-lubricant Al-alloy cylinder material with a mature PEMS nanocoating on piston ring material, will result in a low-friction and wear-resistant cylinder-ring contact interface. Benefits will include protection against intermittent lubrication, an increase in the time-between-overhauls, and reduced system cost.  Application of a thicker PEO-coating and a thicker PEMS nanocoating, may enable oil-less engine operation, thereby reducing maintenance costs and increasing system reliability. Characterization and testing of the coated coupons will include coating thickness verification, surface-roughness measurements, coating-morphology evaluations, and screening friction-wear tribological tests to enable down-selection to one of the mature SwRI coatings (DLC or TiSiCN) for contact with the PEO-converted Al-Si material.  This will enable a selection of the best ring-coating and cylinder coating for further testing (e.g., PLINT ring-section vs. cylinder section AND engine-testing) and characterization in Phase II.  Coordination with a major UAV engine-manufacturer, Northwest UAV, will be performed early in Phase I, to obtain engine component requirements, e.g., specific materials selection, dimensional tolerances, surface finish, expected operating conditions, etc..  This unique PEO manufacturing technology has application to numerous DoD needs, including replacement of toxic hard Chrome plate for corrosion protection of critical hardware, ablative-liners for gun-barrel life extension, and rotorcraft sliding-seat hardware interfaces.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

11 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2015–2023). Reported award amounts total $2,288,702. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, Department of Energy

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.