SBIR/STTR Research Award

Portable, Patient-Administered, Sensor-Enhanced Scalp Cooling Cap and Smartphone App to Reduce Provider Burden, Improve Patient Access, and Improve Patient Outcomes for Chemotherapy-induced Alopecia

Award identifier e19c888da238a77da0b7662df0a443bba551afa2b0a015df7fddfa62f596a92aAwarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$210,997

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2021

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
COOLER HEADS CARE INC
Proposal award date
2021-02-01
Contract end date
2022-01-31
UEI
VX8DS9KMYGT4
Solicitation number
PA19-272
Topic code
102

Research abstract

PROJECT SUMMARY—Drawing on the experiences of patients and healthcare providers, Cooler Heads Care has engineered a low-cost, portable, sensor-enhanced scalp cooling device and smartphone app patients can use to prevent the disfiguring effects of chemotherapy-induced alopecia (CIA). Despite the efficacy of scalp cooling, most infusion centers do not offer scalp cooling because the devices are bulky, expensive, and burdensome. Commercialization of a portable, patient-administered device has the potential to eliminate provider burden; reduce costs; and improve patient access, well-being, and quality of life. Each year, andgt; 650,000 Americans undergo chemotherapy, and andgt; 65% experience CIA. Patients rank CIA as one of the most concerning side effects of chemotherapy, and it is a significant contributor to poor body image, decreased psychological well-being, and higher rates of depression—all of which contribute to higher costs and poorer outcomes. Multiple trials have shown that cooling the scalp to 3o to 5o C during and after chemotherapy is the most effective means for preventing CIA. Unfortunately, only about 20% of infusion centers offer scalp cooling because 1) the center must lease / maintain the device; 2) staff must administer it; 3) only two patients can use it at a time; 4) it extends use of the infusion chair by up to 3.5 hours; and 5) inconsistent insurance coverage presents challenges for charging. Patients can rent gel cap systems, but dry ice and a person to administer the treatment can cost andgt; $5,000. To overcome these challenges, Cooler Heads designed a patient-administered portable device the size of a carry-on suitcase that patients can rent for $800 for the duration of chemotherapy. The device includes an electric chiller connected to a comfortable multi-leaf cap that expands to fit the patient’s head, and sensors in the cap monitor scalp temperature and modulate coolant flow. An onboard battery and car charger allow mobile use after infusions, freeing up chairs for other patients. A smartphone app provides patient reminders and instructional videos, tracks infusion times, and provides tips on hair care. The FDA has determined Cooler Heads needs to 1) develop training materials and conduct usability testing to demonstrate patients can use the device as intended (Phase I SBIR) and 2) conduct a trial to demonstrate the patient-administered device is efficacious (future Phase II). Thus, Cooler Heads proposes the following: Aim. Demonstrate the feasibility of delivering scalp cooling with a patient-administered device. Sub-Aim 1. Develop and refine training materials to demonstrate the use of the device. Sub-Aim 2. In a study with 20 healthy adults from diverse backgrounds, assess the usability of the device and feasibility of self-administration in a simulated chemotherapy infusion scenario. Milestones: 1) ≥ 80% of participants can complete critical tasks without outside assistance, 2) ≥ 90% can complete them with phone support, 3) avg. setup time ≤ 10 min. Impact: This device has the potential to transform the delivery of scalp cooling, meeting NCI’s Cancer Moonshot priority for reducing major side effects of cancer therapy by reducing barriers that prevent most patients from accessing this effective technology.PROJECT NARRATIVE Patients facing the prospect of chemotherapy consistently report that hair loss is one of their biggest concerns, and patients who experience hair loss due to chemotherapy suffer from poor body image, decreased psychological well-being, and higher rates of depression. Cooling the scalp before, during, and after chemotherapy greatly reduces the risk of hair loss from chemotherapy, but the available devices have several limitations that prevent about 80% of chemotherapy infusion centers from offering them to patients. This study is designed to test the feasibility of using a portable, patient-administered scalp cooling device, which is expected to eliminate the burden for infusion centers, reduce costs, and expand access to essentially any patient anywhere in the US, resulting in improved patient well-being and quality of life.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

2 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2021–2022). Reported award amounts total $2,280,917. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase II, Phase I

Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.