SBIR/STTR Research Award

SBIR Phase I: Novel Gynecological Speculum Instrument for Decreased Patient Pain and Enhanced Provider Functionality

Award identifier 33575f4d83b4976185a4fb3ae42bb60b4f10e43672d347fb754d0bef5b231b5fAwarding agency National Science Foundation

Award amount

$305,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2025

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
National Science Foundation
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
Yona Care
Proposal award date
2025-10-01
Contract end date
2026-03-31
UEI
CYQ7N25KNXE3
Solicitation number
NSF 24-579
Topic code
MD

Research abstract

The broader impact/commercial potential of this Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Phase I project is a novel design approach for the gynecological speculum, a common instrument used for diagnostic exams and treatment procedures. Each year in the US, over 69.4 million speculum exams and procedures are performed with 40% of first-time patients reporting pain and 60% reporting anxiety. Common issues include pain, discomfort, and other factors that can result in potential trauma and stress. These factors deter patients from seeking out and adhering to care. This project utilizes human factors and ergonomic science for a differentiated form factor that aims to improve diagnostic accuracy, improve care processes and outcomes, and reduce barriers leading to long term care adherence for an instrument with a $462 million annual market. This Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Phase I project seeks to develop a 3-leafed gynecological speculum offering a broader, unencumbered field of view for the provider while reducing pressure on sensitive tissues for the patient. The novel instrument design redistributes and reduces pressure against the walls to enable better provider visualization of internal cavity organs and improving the patient’s exam experience. This project includes advancing the design engineering and iterative prototyping which will then be validated using a combination of a benchtop anatomical model, instrumented prototypes, and user feedback with objective human factors endpoints. The specific aspects are to 1) evaluate and optimize the opening angle and shape of the upper leaves to maximize field of view and evenly distribute applied pressure to the tissue walls upon dilation, 2) conduct testing on the integration of lighting and locking elements, and 3) optimize material selection and design of the silicone sheathing. The objective of Phase I is an optimized opening angle and form factor that addresses patient pain and provider field of view, ergonomically qualified locking and lighting for provider efficacy, and selection of most suitable materials for a final prototype. This award reflects NSF's statutory mission and has been deemed worthy of support through evaluation using the Foundation's intellectual merit and broader impacts review criteria.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

2 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2025). Reported award amounts total $575,295. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I

Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services, National Science Foundation

Agency intelligence

National Science Foundation

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.