SBIR/STTR Research Award

Bayesian-Based Probabilistic Limit Cycle Oscillation Prediction of Aircraft with Stores

Award identifier 0e0f66bda0bbb354fb2fb4fd028568610ffa5988776e888c1f0a794794372f97Awarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$749,989

Program and phase

STTR · Phase II

Award year

2020

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
ZONA TECHNOLOGY INC
Proposal award date
2020-09-30
Contract end date
2022-12-30
UEI
LYMKH9UK64J7
Solicitation number
18.B
Topic code
AF18B-T008

Research abstract

The overall technical objective of the Phase II effort is to extend the Phase I developments and achieve a fully predictive Bayesian-based, data driven, probabilistic prediction tool of the F-16 limit cycle oscillation (LCO). This tool will rely on the available flight test data on some configurations to predict the LCO amplitude on different configurations within an uncertainty band that account for all uncertainties. These predictions will be achieved using a calibrated finite element model of the F-16 and either ZONA Euler Unsteady Solver (ZEUS) or NASA’s FUN3D code as aeroelastic analysis software whichever is faster while providing the necessary accuracy. Both of these codes will be enriched with the nonlinear structural damping (NSD) model developed earlier by the ZONA/ASU Team which captures the changes in damping taking place when the deformations of the structure become large. A separate set of comparisons of the F-16 behavior predicted by ZEUS with NSD and FUN3D with NSD will elucidate the selection of one aeroelastic software over the other. The NSD model includes two tunable damping parameters a and g. Extending the Phase I efforts, the mean values of these two parameters will be correlated to the flight conditions and F-16 with stores configuration to first permit a deterministic computation of the LCO amplitudes. Next, the damping parameters will be considered as random to model the epistemic and aleatoric uncertainties in the predictions/validations with flight test data. Further, their joint distribution will be estimated in a Bayesian format using available historical flight test data on 10 different configurations. Finally, the posterior distribution and uncertainty bands of the LCO amplitude will be predicted for any new configuration/flight test conditions which could then be used to assess, probabilistically, whether the particular stores configuration can be cleared for flight. The Monte Carlo simulations involved in this last phase will be greatly sped up through the use of the fast LCO amplitude surrogate developed and successfully validated in Phase I in the context of ZEUS with NSD. The validity of this surrogate with FUN3D with NSD data is expected and will be confirmed in Phase II.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

96 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1997–2021). Reported award amounts total $29,806,305. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, National Science Foundation

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.