SBIR/STTR Research Award

Iomab-ACT: A phase I/II study of 131-I apamistamab targeted lymphodepletion followed by CD19-targeted CAR T-cell therapy for patients with relapsed or refractory B-ALL or DLBCL

Award identifier 83338eef4fb5808cb12227ad006df6006b1032d43cbd3abaebe8470ba58df442Awarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$378,389

Program and phase

STTR · Phase I

Award year

2020

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Proposal award date
2020-09-09
Contract end date
2021-08-31
UEI
T8BLSFLLLKN4
Solicitation number
PA19-271
Topic code
102

Research abstract

ABSTRACT Despite treatment advances, the prognosis of adult patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) and R/R diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) remains poor. Autologous T- cells modified to express a CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptor (CAR T-cells) produce durable responses in subgroups of these patients, which has led to FDA approval of two such therapies to date; numerous other CAR T-cell therapies are under investigation, including a CD19-targeted CAR T-cell product bearing a CD28 costimulatory domain (19-28z) developed at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. However, CAR T-cell therapy for B-ALL and DLBCL is associated with high risk of severe neurologic toxicity (including encephalopathy, dysphasia, seizures, and rarely, cerebral edema) and cytokine release syndrome (CRS). Host monocytes are the major source of elevated cytokines (IL-1, IL-6) observed in the context of neurologic toxicity. Administration of conditioning or “lymphodepleting” chemotherapy prior to CAR T-cell infusion, most commonly cyclophosphamide and fludarabine, appears to improve CAR T-cell expansion and efficacy by several mechanisms. However, a conditioning strategy that depletes monocytes as well as lymphocytes may reduce the risk of severe neurologic toxicity while preserving antitumor efficacy. The anti-CD45 antibody apamistamab labeled with 131-iodine (131-I apamistamab) is being investigated as myeloablative conditioning prior to hematopoietic cell transplantation in the Phase III SIERRA trial for patients with active, R/R acute myeloid leukemia. In SIERRA, transient lymphodepletion is observed clinically when 131-I apamistamab is given at low doses for dosimetry. Additionally, in preclinical models, a single low dose of 131-I-radiolabeled anti-CD45 antibody efficiently depletes lymphocytes, myeloid-derived suppressor cells, and regulatory T-cells, without impact on bone marrow hematopoietic stem cells. We propose investigating low-dose 131-I apamistamab in lieu of conditioning chemotherapy prior to 19-28z CAR T-cell therapy in patients with R/R B-ALL or R/R DLBCL, hypothesizing this will more effectively deplete host monocytes and reduce cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) levels of monocyte-derived cytokines, and thereby lower the incidence of severe neurologic toxicity following 19-28z CAR T-cell infusion. This clinical trial will be the first to test radiopharmaceutical conditioning prior to CAR T-cell therapy. The phase I/II study is designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose of 131-I apamistamab in this setting and subsequently to assess the incidence of severe neurologic toxicity associated with 131-I apamistamab conditioning and 19-28z CAR T-cell therapy in patients with R/R B-ALL or R/R DLBCL, as well as antitumor efficacy. A correlative study plan will characterize the effects of 131-I apamistamab on cytokine profiles in blood and CSF, and on the composition of the immune cellular microenvironment. Results of this trial can be applied toward ongoing development and refinement of CAR T-cell therapies targeting hematologic and non-hematologic malignancies.NARRATIVE Certain resistant forms of leukemia and lymphoma may be treated with a combination of chemotherapy and tumor-targeted immunotherapy made by modifying a patient’s own immune cells (CD19-targeted CAR T-cell therapy), but serious side effects including a spectrum of neurological toxicities known as ICANS and a serious inflammatory reaction known as CRS occur in a significant percentage of patients. White blood cells called monocytes secrete the signal molecules (cytokines) that initiate the inflammatory cascade leading to ICANS and CRS; therefore, giving a treatment to eliminate monocytes before CAR T-cell therapy (instead of chemotherapy) may decrease the risk of serious side effects. Actinium herein proposes a clinical trial, to be conducted at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, evaluating the use of a radioisotope-linked antibody targeting monocytes and other immune cells (CD45-targeted antibody drug conjugate, iodine 131 [131-I] apamistamab), in place of chemotherapy, to help make CAR T-cell treatment safer and more effective for patients with resistant blood cancers.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

2 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2020–2023). Reported award amounts total $2,109,005. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase II, Phase I

Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.