SBIR/STTR Research Award

HJ7-50A COAXIAL CABLE RADIO FREQUENCY NSN 6145-01-123-7019 WORK ADDITIONS FOR TESTING

Award identifier ffde7119f19bdfcc980795e70d0c7b94db2743c9e93c85b232468a2dd3ab24cfAwarding agency Department of Defense · Defense Logistics Agency

Award amount

$795,221

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2020

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Defense Logistics Agency
Recipient company
Brighton Cromwell, LLC
Proposal award date
2020-08-31
Contract end date
2021-08-30
UEI
K7QWMTNE77W4
Solicitation number
18.1
Topic code
DLA181-006

Research abstract

ABSTRACT AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN: In our current contract SP4701-20-C-0014 (Phase II), Brighton Cromwell generated the documentation to improve product availability and increase competition through the development of Small Business eligible manufacturing for coaxial cable assemblies for form, fit and function equivalency with NSN 6145-01-123-7019. There is no military qualified product for this coaxial cable assembly. Under our current contract, BCTC identified two commercial Suppliers currently supplying 1-5/8 50 Ohm coax that most closely matched the requirements for NSN 6145-01-123-7019, and identified all testing required to qualify this cable in accordance with USAF aviation regulation, standards (Boeing Specification 10-22453-2) requirements. After identifying all testing requirements and fixturing demands, BCTC developed a DVP&R (Design Verification Plan and Report) outlining all the testing required to qualify these parts. Also, BCTC generated a detailed program schedule and over-arching test strategy to support the qualification of both commercial products. This test strategy evaluates cables from two different manufacturers. Both manufacturers' products satisfy BAA requirements. 88% of CommScope cable is manufactured in Catawba, NC, with the remaining 12% (inner copper conductor) manufactured in Germany. The CommScope coax is produced with a modern foam core dielectric and does not utilize adhesive to bond the inner conductor. CommScope manufactures this size cable every year. Superior Essex shall supply new old stock manufactured to the legacy Andrew Corp requirements, and originated from the original Orland Park, IL facility. This survivor stock is the last that exists. Superior Essex manufactures all their coax cable in South Korea, and they will never produce this old style of 1-5/8" 50 Ohm cable again. This proposal is for the testing and qualifying of these two cables to determine acceptability to meet the performance criteria established in the Boeing specification 10-22453-2 and the additional requirements established by Brighton Cromwell LLC DVP&R and in agreement with the Air Force team.  The following figure identifies where the qualification of the product shall occur and by whom.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

14 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2018–2021). Reported award amounts total $8,705,088. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase II, Phase I

Agencies: Department of Defense

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.